From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb+git@google.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-efi@vger.kernel.org,
x86@kernel.org, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Kevin Loughlin <kevinloughlin@google.com>,
Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>,
Nikunj A Dadhania <nikunj@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 15/22] objtool: Add action to check for absence of absolute relocations
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2025 13:32:43 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250716113243.GU1613200@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMj1kXHNvPdgG+OKX6UB70oTzzbvovfvDhSH73vAj-q7G03c5Q@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Jul 16, 2025 at 08:26:55PM +1000, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> For robustness, we should actually check for all absolute relocations
> here, including R_X86_64_32S, which is not abstracted into a R_ABSxx
> type for objtool.
>
> So perhaps this needs an arch hook where x86_64 can implement it as
>
> bool arch_is_abs_reloc(reloc)
> {
> switch (reloc_type(reloc)) {
> case R_X86_64_32:
> case R_X86_64_32S:
> case R_X86_64_64:
> return true;
> }
> return false;
> }
>
> and the default just compares against R_ABS32 / R_ABS64 depending on
> the word size?
Yes, an arch hook like that makes sense. Perhaps make the signature:
bool arch_is_abs_reloc(struct elf *, struct reloc *);
Because the word size comes from elf_addr_size().
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-16 11:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-16 3:18 [PATCH v5 00/22] x86: strict separation of startup code Ard Biesheuvel
2025-07-16 3:18 ` [PATCH v5 01/22] x86/sev: Separate MSR and GHCB based snp_cpuid() via a callback Ard Biesheuvel
2025-07-16 16:52 ` Tom Lendacky
2025-07-16 3:18 ` [PATCH v5 02/22] x86/sev: Use MSR protocol for remapping SVSM calling area Ard Biesheuvel
2025-07-16 17:03 ` Tom Lendacky
2025-07-18 9:45 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2025-07-16 3:18 ` [PATCH v5 03/22] x86/sev: Use MSR protocol only for early SVSM PVALIDATE call Ard Biesheuvel
2025-07-16 3:18 ` [PATCH v5 04/22] x86/sev: Run RMPADJUST on SVSM calling area page to test VMPL Ard Biesheuvel
2025-07-16 3:18 ` [PATCH v5 05/22] x86/sev: Move GHCB page based HV communication out of startup code Ard Biesheuvel
2025-07-16 3:18 ` [PATCH v5 06/22] x86/sev: Avoid global variable to store virtual address of SVSM area Ard Biesheuvel
2025-07-16 3:18 ` [PATCH v5 07/22] x86/sev: Share implementation of MSR-based page state change Ard Biesheuvel
2025-07-16 3:18 ` [PATCH v5 08/22] x86/sev: Pass SVSM calling area down to early page state change API Ard Biesheuvel
2025-07-16 3:18 ` [PATCH v5 09/22] x86/sev: Use boot SVSM CA for all startup and init code Ard Biesheuvel
2025-07-16 3:18 ` [PATCH v5 10/22] x86/boot: Drop redundant RMPADJUST in SEV SVSM presence check Ard Biesheuvel
2025-07-16 3:18 ` [PATCH v5 11/22] x86/boot: Provide PIC aliases for 5-level paging related constants Ard Biesheuvel
2025-07-16 3:18 ` [PATCH v5 12/22] x86/sev: Provide PIC aliases for SEV related data objects Ard Biesheuvel
2025-07-16 3:18 ` [PATCH v5 13/22] x86/sev: Move __sev_[get|put]_ghcb() into separate noinstr object Ard Biesheuvel
2025-07-16 3:18 ` [PATCH v5 14/22] x86/sev: Export startup routines for later use Ard Biesheuvel
2025-07-16 3:18 ` [PATCH v5 15/22] objtool: Add action to check for absence of absolute relocations Ard Biesheuvel
2025-07-16 9:54 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-07-16 10:26 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2025-07-16 11:32 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2025-07-16 20:48 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2025-07-16 3:18 ` [PATCH v5 16/22] x86/boot: Check startup code " Ard Biesheuvel
2025-07-16 3:18 ` [PATCH v5 17/22] x86/boot: Revert "Reject absolute references in .head.text" Ard Biesheuvel
2025-07-16 3:18 ` [PATCH v5 18/22] x86/kbuild: Incorporate boot/startup/ via Kbuild makefile Ard Biesheuvel
2025-07-16 3:18 ` [PATCH v5 19/22] x86/boot: Create a confined code area for startup code Ard Biesheuvel
2025-07-16 3:18 ` [PATCH v5 20/22] efistub/x86: Remap inittext read-execute when needed Ard Biesheuvel
2025-07-16 3:18 ` [PATCH v5 21/22] x86/boot: Move startup code out of __head section Ard Biesheuvel
2025-07-16 3:18 ` [PATCH v5 22/22] x86/boot: Get rid of the .head.text section Ard Biesheuvel
2025-07-16 14:27 ` [PATCH v5 00/22] x86: strict separation of startup code Tom Lendacky
2025-07-16 22:02 ` Ard Biesheuvel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250716113243.GU1613200@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=ardb+git@google.com \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=jpoimboe@kernel.org \
--cc=kevinloughlin@google.com \
--cc=linux-efi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=nikunj@amd.com \
--cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox