From: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb+git@google.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
"Mike Rapoport (Microsoft)" <rppt@kernel.org>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2 02/19] efi: Tag memblock reservations of boot services regions as RSRV_KERN
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2026 10:05:32 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260319090529.1091660-23-ardb+git@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260319090529.1091660-21-ardb+git@google.com>
From: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
By definition, EFI memory regions of type boot services code or data
have no special significance to the firmware at runtime, only to the OS.
In some cases, the firmware will allocate tables and other assets that
are passed in memory in regions of this type, and leave it up to the OS
to decide whether or not to treat the allocation as special, or simply
consume the contents at boot and recycle the RAM for ordinary use. The
reason for this approach is that it avoids needless memory reservations
for assets that the OS knows nothing about, and therefore doesn't know
how to free either.
This means that any memblock reservations covering such regions can be
marked as MEMBLOCK_RSRV_KERN - this is a better match semantically, and
is useful on x86 to distinguish true reservations from temporary
reservations that are only needed to work around firmware bugs.
Acked-by: Mike Rapoport (Microsoft) <rppt@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
---
drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c b/drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c
index b2fb92a4bbd1..e4ab7481bbf6 100644
--- a/drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c
+++ b/drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c
@@ -600,7 +600,9 @@ void __init efi_mem_reserve(phys_addr_t addr, u64 size)
return;
if (!memblock_is_region_reserved(addr, size))
- memblock_reserve(addr, size);
+ memblock_reserve_kern(addr, size);
+ else
+ memblock_reserved_mark_kern(addr, size);
/*
* Some architectures (x86) reserve all boot services ranges
--
2.53.0.851.ga537e3e6e9-goog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-19 9:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-19 9:05 [PATCH v2 00/19] efi/x86: Avoid the need to mangle the EFI memory map Ard Biesheuvel
2026-03-19 9:05 ` [PATCH v2 01/19] memblock: Permit existing reserved regions to be marked RSRV_KERN Ard Biesheuvel
2026-03-19 9:05 ` Ard Biesheuvel [this message]
2026-03-19 9:05 ` [PATCH v2 03/19] x86/efi: Unmap kernel-reserved boot regions from EFI page tables Ard Biesheuvel
2026-03-19 9:05 ` [PATCH v2 04/19] x86/efi: Drop EFI_MEMORY_RUNTIME check from __ioremap_check_other() Ard Biesheuvel
2026-03-19 9:05 ` [PATCH v2 05/19] x86/efi: Omit RSRV_KERN memblock reservations when freeing boot regions Ard Biesheuvel
2026-03-19 9:05 ` [PATCH v2 06/19] x86/efi: Defer sub-1M check from unmap to free stage Ard Biesheuvel
2026-03-19 9:05 ` [PATCH v2 07/19] x86/efi: Simplify real mode trampoline allocation quirk Ard Biesheuvel
2026-03-19 9:05 ` [PATCH v2 08/19] x86/efi: Omit redundant kernel image overlap check Ard Biesheuvel
2026-03-19 9:05 ` [PATCH v2 09/19] x86/efi: Drop redundant EFI_PARAVIRT check Ard Biesheuvel
2026-03-19 9:05 ` [PATCH v2 10/19] x86/efi: Do not rely on EFI_MEMORY_RUNTIME bit and avoid entry splitting Ard Biesheuvel
2026-03-19 9:05 ` [PATCH v2 11/19] efi: Use nr_map not map_end to find the last valid memory map entry Ard Biesheuvel
2026-03-19 9:05 ` [PATCH v2 12/19] x86/efi: Only merge EFI memory map entries on 32-bit systems Ard Biesheuvel
2026-03-19 9:05 ` [PATCH v2 13/19] x86/efi: Clean the memory map using iterator and filter API Ard Biesheuvel
2026-03-19 9:05 ` [PATCH v2 14/19] x86/efi: Update the runtime map in place Ard Biesheuvel
2026-03-19 9:05 ` [PATCH v2 15/19] x86/efi: Use iterator API when mapping EFI regions for runtime Ard Biesheuvel
2026-03-19 9:05 ` [PATCH v2 16/19] x86/efi: Reuse memory map instead of reallocating it Ard Biesheuvel
2026-03-19 9:05 ` [PATCH v2 17/19] x86/efi: Defer compaction of the EFI memory map Ard Biesheuvel
2026-03-19 9:05 ` [PATCH v2 18/19] x86/efi: Do not abuse RUNTIME bit to mark boot regions as reserved Ard Biesheuvel
2026-03-19 9:05 ` [PATCH v2 19/19] x86/efi: Free unused tail of the EFI memory map Ard Biesheuvel
2026-03-24 9:50 ` [PATCH v2 00/19] efi/x86: Avoid the need to mangle " Ard Biesheuvel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260319090529.1091660-23-ardb+git@google.com \
--to=ardb+git@google.com \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=linux-efi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox