From: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb+git@google.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
"Mike Rapoport (Microsoft)" <rppt@kernel.org>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
Dave Young <ruirui.yang@linux.dev>,
Gregory Price <gourry@gourry.net>
Subject: [PATCH v3 17/17] x86/efi: Drop kexec quirk for the EFI memory attributes table
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2026 17:20:42 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260423152024.1098465-36-ardb+git@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260423152024.1098465-19-ardb+git@google.com>
From: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Now that the EFI memory attributes table is preserved properly, and the
quirk to detect corrupted tables has been updated not to result in false
positives when the number of EFI memory map entries is low compared to
the number of EFI memory attributes table entries, there is no longer a
need to ignore the latter when doing a kexec boot. So drop the
workaround.
This reverts commit
64b45dd46e15 ("x86/efi: skip memattr table on kexec boot")
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
---
arch/x86/platform/efi/quirks.c | 4 ----
1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/platform/efi/quirks.c b/arch/x86/platform/efi/quirks.c
index fc6a15c2ace6..92d37f2a5cbe 100644
--- a/arch/x86/platform/efi/quirks.c
+++ b/arch/x86/platform/efi/quirks.c
@@ -522,10 +522,6 @@ int __init efi_reuse_config(u64 tables, int nr_tables)
if (!efi_guidcmp(guid, SMBIOS_TABLE_GUID))
((efi_config_table_64_t *)p)->table = data->smbios;
- /* Do not bother to play with mem attr table across kexec */
- if (!efi_guidcmp(guid, EFI_MEMORY_ATTRIBUTES_TABLE_GUID))
- ((efi_config_table_64_t *)p)->table = EFI_INVALID_TABLE_ADDR;
-
p += sz;
}
early_memunmap(tablep, nr_tables * sz);
--
2.54.0.rc2.544.gc7ae2d5bb8-goog
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-23 15:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-23 15:20 [PATCH v3 00/17] efi/x86: Avoid the need to mangle the EFI memory map Ard Biesheuvel
2026-04-23 15:20 ` [PATCH v3 01/17] x86/efi: Omit redundant kernel image overlap check Ard Biesheuvel
2026-04-28 8:21 ` Mike Rapoport
2026-04-28 10:40 ` Gregory Price
2026-04-23 15:20 ` [PATCH v3 02/17] x86/efi: Drop redundant EFI_PARAVIRT check Ard Biesheuvel
2026-04-28 8:21 ` Mike Rapoport
2026-04-28 10:42 ` Gregory Price
2026-04-23 15:20 ` [PATCH v3 03/17] x86/efi: Only merge EFI memory map entries on 32-bit systems Ard Biesheuvel
2026-04-28 10:47 ` Gregory Price
2026-04-23 15:20 ` [PATCH v3 04/17] x86/efi: Defer sub-1M check from unmap to free stage Ard Biesheuvel
2026-04-28 8:25 ` Mike Rapoport
2026-04-23 15:20 ` [PATCH v3 05/17] x86/efi: Simplify real mode trampoline allocation quirk Ard Biesheuvel
2026-04-28 8:32 ` Mike Rapoport
2026-04-23 15:20 ` [PATCH v3 06/17] x86/efi: Unmap kernel-reserved boot regions from EFI page tables Ard Biesheuvel
2026-04-23 15:20 ` [PATCH v3 07/17] x86/efi: Drop EFI_MEMORY_RUNTIME check from __ioremap_check_other() Ard Biesheuvel
2026-04-23 15:20 ` [PATCH v3 08/17] x86/efi: Allow ranges_to_free array to grow beyond initial size Ard Biesheuvel
2026-04-28 8:38 ` Mike Rapoport
2026-04-23 15:20 ` [PATCH v3 09/17] x86/efi: Intersect ranges_to_free with MEMBLOCK_RSRV_KERN regions Ard Biesheuvel
2026-04-28 8:40 ` Mike Rapoport
2026-04-23 15:20 ` [PATCH v3 10/17] x86/efi: Do not rely on EFI_MEMORY_RUNTIME bit and avoid entry splitting Ard Biesheuvel
2026-04-23 15:20 ` [PATCH v3 11/17] efi: Use nr_map not map_end to find the last valid memory map entry Ard Biesheuvel
2026-04-23 15:20 ` [PATCH v3 12/17] x86/efi: Clean the memory map using iterator and filter API Ard Biesheuvel
2026-04-23 15:20 ` [PATCH v3 13/17] x86/efi: Update the runtime map in place Ard Biesheuvel
2026-04-23 15:20 ` [PATCH v3 14/17] x86/efi: Reuse memory map instead of reallocating it Ard Biesheuvel
2026-04-23 15:20 ` [PATCH v3 15/17] x86/efi: Merge two traversals of the memory map when freeing boot regions Ard Biesheuvel
2026-04-23 15:20 ` [PATCH v3 16/17] x86/efi: Avoid EFI_MEMORY_RUNTIME for early EFI boot memory reservations Ard Biesheuvel
2026-04-23 15:20 ` Ard Biesheuvel [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260423152024.1098465-36-ardb+git@google.com \
--to=ardb+git@google.com \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=gourry@gourry.net \
--cc=linux-efi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=ruirui.yang@linux.dev \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox