Re: [PATCH v6 0/3] riscv32 library enhancements and build fixes

Andy Shevchenko
2026-04-27T08:25:34Z

On Mon, Apr 27, 2026 at 11:23:59AM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 27, 2026 at 11:13:20AM +0300, Dmitry Antipov wrote:
> > On Sat, 2026-04-25 at 14:36 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> >
> > > I didn't upstream "lib and lib/cmdline enhancements v9" this cycle.
> >
> > You don't have to upstream v9. Because v9 is v8 + initial RISC-V build
> > fix, which is a part of another series (this one) now. The proper sequence
> > is v8 + this series.
> >
> > > So can we please sort through these things (and the AI review) before
> > > adding more?
> >
> > Not sure about AI but hopefully human should realize that I'm not an
> > expert in m68k/sparc32/xtensa/csky/[your favorite arch here]. Enabling
> > and running the test on _all_ architectures where it is expected to
> > work requires obtaining (or even building by myself) a cross-compiler,
> > setting up the kernel and QEMU, etc. I've spent a reasonable time with
> > RISC-V and ARM and hopefully set up a good starting point for
> > m68k/sparc32/xtensa/csky/[your favorite arch here] maintainers, who are
> > free to incorporate the test into their target architecture.
> >
> > I'm going to fix everything I consider reasonable, submit v7 and give up -
> > because without even a single reply from core RISC-V maintainers, this
> > just turns into an endless brain masturbation.
>
> I believe it's better to issue v10 of that series + v7 of this in one go.

(I meant v8 of that as you said + v7 of this one as v10 of that one, and sorry
for any confusion I added in the previous reply.)

--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko