From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@redhat.com>,
"Borislav Petkov" <bp@alien8.de>,
"Michal Hocko" <mhocko@suse.com>, "Zi Yan" <ziy@nvidia.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
"Dave Hansen" <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
"Naoya Horiguchi" <nao.horiguchi@gmail.com>,
"Miaohe Lin" <linmiaohe@huawei.com>,
"Mike Rapoport" <rppt@kernel.org>,
kas@kernel.org, "Suren Baghdasaryan" <surenb@google.com>,
x86@kernel.org, "Vlastimil Babka" <vbabka@kernel.org>,
"Brendan Jackman" <brendan.jackman@linux.dev>,
"Johannes Weiner" <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
"Lorenzo Stoakes" <ljs@kernel.org>,
"Ard Biesheuvel" <ardb@kernel.org>,
"David Hildenbrand" <david@kernel.org>,
"Liam R. Howlett" <liam@infradead.org>,
"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@kernel.org>,
"Ilias Apalodimas" <ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org>,
"Breno Leitao" <leitao@debian.org>
Cc: rmikey@meta.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, riel@surriel.com,
harry@kernel.org, linux-efi@vger.kernel.org,
kernel-team@meta.com, kexec@lists.infradead.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/5] mm/memory-failure: efi: add the LINUX_EFI_POISONED_MEMORY configuration table
Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2026 13:13:30 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260909131331.1BECD1F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260909-hwpoison-kho-v4-1-359313564495@debian.org>
> Hardware-poisoned page frames are tracked only in the running kernel's
> data structures, so a kexec loses them and the next kernel doesn't have
> this information, thus, tripping into them again.
>
> Add an EFI configuration table to carry that information across kexec.
>
> It is a bitmap with one bit per EFI_POISON_UNIT_SIZE (2MiB) of physical
> memory starting at phys_base, modeled on the LINUX_EFI_UNACCEPTED_MEMORY
> table, and it rides the EFI system table to every kernel in the chain.
> Basing the bitmap keeps a machine whose RAM starts high from paying for
> the hole below it.
>
> List the table in the x86 efi_tables[] too, so an SME host maps it
> unencrypted like every other EFI table.
>
> The Kconfig symbol has no prompt. There is nothing for a user to decide,
> so it is on wherever it can be, and it only costs 64K per TiB of RAM on
> a kernel that already has the EFI stub and MEMORY_FAILURE. It is
> restricted to 64BIT because the unit arithmetic would need div_u64() on
> 32-bit, and there is no 32-bit EFI configuration with MEMORY_FAILURE to
> test that on.
>
> This is a similar approach as used as unaccepted memory.
>
> Suggested-by: Kiryl Shutsemau <kas@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
Sashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues. It looks great!
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260909-hwpoison-kho-v4-0-359313564495@debian.org?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-09 13:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-09 13:05 [PATCH v4 0/5] mm/memory-failure: keep hardware-poisoned pages out of the next kexec Breno Leitao
2026-09-09 13:05 ` [PATCH v4 1/5] mm/memory-failure: efi: add the LINUX_EFI_POISONED_MEMORY configuration table Breno Leitao
2026-09-09 13:13 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-09-09 13:05 ` [PATCH v4 2/5] mm/memory-failure: libstub: install the poisoned-memory EFI table Breno Leitao
2026-09-09 13:19 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-09 14:00 ` Breno Leitao
2026-09-09 14:47 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2026-09-10 13:11 ` Breno Leitao
2026-09-09 13:05 ` [PATCH v4 3/5] mm/memory-failure: efi: record hardware-poisoned frames into the poisoned-memory table Breno Leitao
2026-09-09 13:21 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-09 14:05 ` Breno Leitao
2026-09-09 13:05 ` [PATCH v4 4/5] mm/memory-failure: efi: answer whether a range is poisoned Breno Leitao
2026-09-09 13:17 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-09 13:05 ` [PATCH v4 5/5] mm/memory-failure: keep inherited poisoned frames out of the buddy allocator Breno Leitao
2026-09-09 13:24 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260909131331.1BECD1F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=brendan.jackman@linux.dev \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=harry@kernel.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org \
--cc=kas@kernel.org \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=leitao@debian.org \
--cc=liam@infradead.org \
--cc=linmiaohe@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-efi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=ljs@kernel.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=nao.horiguchi@gmail.com \
--cc=riel@surriel.com \
--cc=rmikey@meta.com \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=tglx@kernel.org \
--cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox