Linux EFI development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Ard Biesheuvel" <ardb@kernel.org>
To: "Guilherme G. Piccoli" <gpiccoli@igalia.com>
Cc: linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org,
	"Ilias Apalodimas" <ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org>,
	"Kees Cook" <kees@kernel.org>, "Tony Luck" <tony.luck@intel.com>,
	stable@vger.kernel.org, kernel-dev@igalia.com,
	kernel@gpiccoli.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH] efi: pstore: Fix pstore_disable parameter setting (if built as module)
Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2026 17:32:57 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <273c9217-4630-4585-8cb5-3c5c8f0b77d3@app.fastmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260906235838.2928815-1-gpiccoli@igalia.com>

Hello Guilherme,

On Mon, 7 Sep 2026, at 01:55, Guilherme G. Piccoli wrote:
> Commit a28655c330ab ("efi: pstore: Allow dynamic initialization based 
> on module parameter")
> introduced the functionality of switching the pstore_disable parameter,
> effectively allowing efi-pstore to be used even if builtin and having
> pstore_disabled=Y (a lot of distros do that at Kconfig level).
>
> Well, it also introduced a bug if efi-pstore is built as module and loaded
> with pstore_disable=N parameter. On load time, load_module() -> parse_args()
> calls our mod_param callback efi_pstore_disable_set(), which initializes
> efi_pstore, registering it as a pstore backend. Happens that, slightly
> later in the module loading process, do_init_module() calls our module
> init function, which currently ... retries registering us as a pstore
> backend. Since this was done successfully before, in the module parameter
> parsing, pstore_register() refuses to re-register us and efi-pstore ends-up
> clearing some structures, like freeing its data buffer allocated memory
> and setting its size to 0.
>
> Net effect of that: efi-pstore ends-up in a weird state, partially
> initialized but with cleared structures. More than that, if we try to
> unload it, it won't call pstore_unregister() but will get the module
> unloaded, hence pstore writes on oops or with other frontends will
> trigger NULL pointer dereferences.
>
> Fix it by guarding efivars_pstore_init() against re-running if the
> driver was previously initialized - this is kind of an analog to
> what is already done on efivars_pstore_exit() and fixes the issue.
>
> Fixes: a28655c330ab ("efi: pstore: Allow dynamic initialization based 
> on module parameter")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Guilherme G. Piccoli <gpiccoli@igalia.com>
> ---
>
>
> Hi folks, apologies for introducing this bug =|

No worries :-)

>
>  drivers/firmware/efi/efi-pstore.c | 3 +++
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/efi/efi-pstore.c 
> b/drivers/firmware/efi/efi-pstore.c
> index a5db3534f0a6..2e125db7d43b 100644
> --- a/drivers/firmware/efi/efi-pstore.c
> +++ b/drivers/firmware/efi/efi-pstore.c
> @@ -263,6 +263,9 @@ static int efivars_pstore_init(void)
>  	if (pstore_disable)
>  		return 0;
> 
> +	if (efi_pstore_info.bufsize)
> +		return 0;
> +

Can we please address the root cause rather than paper over it here?

What is the point of having a) a pstore_disable= param on a module
(which can be blacklisted or simply not loaded) and b) having it
runtime writable so pstore-efi can be toggled on/off at will?

Also, the practice of controlling the functionality of a builtin
diagnostic feature by poking something under /sys/module/foo/params
is in rather poor taste IMNSHO.




>  	/*
>  	 * Notice that 1024 is the minimum here to prevent issues with
>  	 * decompression algorithms that were spotted during tests;
> -- 
> 2.50.1

  reply	other threads:[~2026-09-09 15:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-06 23:55 [PATCH] efi: pstore: Fix pstore_disable parameter setting (if built as module) Guilherme G. Piccoli
2026-09-09 15:32 ` Ard Biesheuvel [this message]
2026-09-09 17:12   ` Guilherme G. Piccoli

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=273c9217-4630-4585-8cb5-3c5c8f0b77d3@app.fastmail.com \
    --to=ardb@kernel.org \
    --cc=gpiccoli@igalia.com \
    --cc=ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org \
    --cc=kees@kernel.org \
    --cc=kernel-dev@igalia.com \
    --cc=kernel@gpiccoli.net \
    --cc=linux-efi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox