From: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>, Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>, Piotr Luc <piotr.luc@intel.com>,
Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>,
Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>,
Reza Arbab <arbab@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk>,
"Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>,
Laura Abbott <labbott@redhat.com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Eric Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
Benjamin
Subject: Re: [RFC Part1 PATCH v3 14/17] x86/boot: Add early boot support when running with SEV active
Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2017 13:54:57 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <42cf82fc-03be-c4c7-eaab-b2306a049d20@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170823153058.yli5qogrmjl74wkl@pd.tnic>
On 8/23/2017 10:30 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 02:07:54PM -0500, Brijesh Singh wrote:
>> From: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
>>
>> Early in the boot process, add checks to determine if the kernel is
>> running with Secure Encrypted Virtualization (SEV) active.
>>
>> Checking for SEV requires checking that the kernel is running under a
>> hypervisor (CPUID 0x00000001, bit 31), that the SEV feature is available
>> (CPUID 0x8000001f, bit 1) and then check a non-interceptable SEV MSR
>> (0xc0010131, bit 0).
>>
>> This check is required so that during early compressed kernel booting the
>> pagetables (both the boot pagetables and KASLR pagetables (if enabled) are
>> updated to include the encryption mask so that when the kernel is
>> decompressed into encrypted memory.
>
> , it can boot properly.
>
> :)
>
Yup, kinda didn't complete that sentence.
>> After the kernel is decompressed and continues booting the same logic is
>> used to check if SEV is active and set a flag indicating so. This allows
>> us to distinguish between SME and SEV, each of which have unique
>> differences in how certain things are handled: e.g. DMA (always bounce
>> buffered with SEV) or EFI tables (always access decrypted with SME).
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>
>> ---
>> arch/x86/boot/compressed/Makefile | 2 +
>> arch/x86/boot/compressed/head_64.S | 16 +++++
>> arch/x86/boot/compressed/mem_encrypt.S | 103 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> arch/x86/boot/compressed/misc.h | 2 +
>> arch/x86/boot/compressed/pagetable.c | 8 ++-
>> arch/x86/include/asm/mem_encrypt.h | 3 +
>> arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h | 3 +
>> arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/kvm_para.h | 1 -
>> arch/x86/mm/mem_encrypt.c | 42 +++++++++++---
>> 9 files changed, 169 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>> create mode 100644 arch/x86/boot/compressed/mem_encrypt.S
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/boot/compressed/Makefile b/arch/x86/boot/compressed/Makefile
>> index 2c860ad..d2fe901 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/boot/compressed/Makefile
>> +++ b/arch/x86/boot/compressed/Makefile
>> @@ -72,6 +72,8 @@ vmlinux-objs-y := $(obj)/vmlinux.lds $(obj)/head_$(BITS).o $(obj)/misc.o \
>> $(obj)/string.o $(obj)/cmdline.o $(obj)/error.o \
>> $(obj)/piggy.o $(obj)/cpuflags.o
>>
>> +vmlinux-objs-$(CONFIG_X86_64) += $(obj)/mem_encrypt.o
>
> There's a
>
> ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
>
> a couple of lines below. Just put it there.
Will do.
>
> ...
>
>> +++ b/arch/x86/boot/compressed/mem_encrypt.S
>> @@ -0,0 +1,103 @@
>> +/*
>> + * AMD Memory Encryption Support
>> + *
>> + * Copyright (C) 2017 Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
>> + *
>> + * Author: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
>> + *
>> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
>> + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
>> + * published by the Free Software Foundation.
>> + */
>> +
>> +#include <linux/linkage.h>
>> +
>> +#include <asm/processor-flags.h>
>> +#include <asm/msr.h>
>> +#include <asm/asm-offsets.h>
>> +
>> + .text
>> + .code32
>> +ENTRY(get_sev_encryption_bit)
>> + xor %eax, %eax
>> +
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_AMD_MEM_ENCRYPT
>> + push %ebx
>> + push %ecx
>> + push %edx
>> +
>> + /* Check if running under a hypervisor */
>> + movl $1, %eax
>> + cpuid
>> + bt $31, %ecx /* Check the hypervisor bit */
>> + jnc .Lno_sev
>> +
>> + movl $0x80000000, %eax /* CPUID to check the highest leaf */
>> + cpuid
>> + cmpl $0x8000001f, %eax /* See if 0x8000001f is available */
>> + jb .Lno_sev
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * Check for the SEV feature:
>> + * CPUID Fn8000_001F[EAX] - Bit 1
>> + * CPUID Fn8000_001F[EBX] - Bits 5:0
>> + * Pagetable bit position used to indicate encryption
>> + */
>> + movl $0x8000001f, %eax
>> + cpuid
>> + bt $1, %eax /* Check if SEV is available */
>> + jnc .Lno_sev
>> +
>> + movl $MSR_F17H_SEV, %ecx /* Read the SEV MSR */
>> + rdmsr
>> + bt $MSR_F17H_SEV_ENABLED_BIT, %eax /* Check if SEV is active */
>> + jnc .Lno_sev
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * Get memory encryption information:
>> + */
>
> The side-comment is enough. This one above can go.
Done.
>
>> + movl %ebx, %eax
>> + andl $0x3f, %eax /* Return the encryption bit location */
>> + jmp .Lsev_exit
>> +
>> +.Lno_sev:
>> + xor %eax, %eax
>> +
>> +.Lsev_exit:
>> + pop %edx
>> + pop %ecx
>> + pop %ebx
>> +
>> +#endif /* CONFIG_AMD_MEM_ENCRYPT */
>> +
>> + ret
>> +ENDPROC(get_sev_encryption_bit)
>> +
>> + .code64
>> +ENTRY(get_sev_encryption_mask)
>> + xor %rax, %rax
>> +
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_AMD_MEM_ENCRYPT
>> + push %rbp
>> + push %rdx
>> +
>> + movq %rsp, %rbp /* Save current stack pointer */
>> +
>> + call get_sev_encryption_bit /* Get the encryption bit position */
>
> So we get to call get_sev_encryption_bit() here again and noodle through
> the CPUID discovery and MSR access. We should instead cache that info
> and return the encryption bit directly on a second call. (And initialize
> it to -1 to denote that get_sev_encryption_bit() hasn't run yet).
Ok, I'll look into that optimization.
>
> ...
>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/mem_encrypt.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/mem_encrypt.h
>> index 9274ec7..9cb6472 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/mem_encrypt.h
>> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/mem_encrypt.h
>> @@ -19,6 +19,9 @@
>>
>> #include <asm/bootparam.h>
>>
>> +#define AMD_SME_FEATURE_BIT BIT(0)
>> +#define AMD_SEV_FEATURE_BIT BIT(1)
>
> s/_FEATURE//
>
> AMD_SME_BIT and AMD_SEV_BIT is good enough :)
>
> And frankly, if you're going to use them only below in sme_enable() - I
> need to check more thoroughly the remaining patches - but if you only
> are going to use them there, just define them inside the function so
> that they're close.
Sounds good. I believe that is the only place they are/will be used
so I'll make that change.
>
>> +
>> #ifdef CONFIG_AMD_MEM_ENCRYPT
>>
>> extern unsigned long sme_me_mask;
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h
>> index e399d68..530020f 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h
>> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h
>> @@ -326,6 +326,9 @@
>>
>> /* Fam 17h MSRs */
>> #define MSR_F17H_IRPERF 0xc00000e9
>> +#define MSR_F17H_SEV 0xc0010131
>
> If that MSR is going to be used later on - and I don't see why not - you
> probably should make it an arch one: MSR_AMD64_SEV. Even if it isn't yet
> officially. :-)
>
Will do.
>> +#define MSR_F17H_SEV_ENABLED_BIT 0
>> +#define MSR_F17H_SEV_ENABLED BIT_ULL(MSR_F17H_SEV_ENABLED_BIT)
>>
>> /* Fam 16h MSRs */
>> #define MSR_F16H_L2I_PERF_CTL 0xc0010230
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/kvm_para.h b/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/kvm_para.h
>> index a965e5b..c202ba3 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/kvm_para.h
>> +++ b/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/kvm_para.h
>> @@ -109,5 +109,4 @@ struct kvm_vcpu_pv_apf_data {
>> #define KVM_PV_EOI_ENABLED KVM_PV_EOI_MASK
>> #define KVM_PV_EOI_DISABLED 0x0
>>
>> -
>> #endif /* _UAPI_ASM_X86_KVM_PARA_H */
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/mem_encrypt.c b/arch/x86/mm/mem_encrypt.c
>> index 5e5d460..ed8780e 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/mm/mem_encrypt.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/mm/mem_encrypt.c
>> @@ -288,7 +288,9 @@ void __init mem_encrypt_init(void)
>> if (sev_active())
>> dma_ops = &sme_dma_ops;
>>
>> - pr_info("AMD Secure Memory Encryption (SME) active\n");
>> + pr_info("AMD %s active\n",
>> + sev_active() ? "Secure Encrypted Virtualization (SEV)"
>> + : "Secure Memory Encryption (SME)");
>> }
>>
>> void swiotlb_set_mem_attributes(void *vaddr, unsigned long size)
>> @@ -616,12 +618,23 @@ void __init __nostackprotector sme_enable(struct boot_params *bp)
>> {
>> const char *cmdline_ptr, *cmdline_arg, *cmdline_on, *cmdline_off;
>> unsigned int eax, ebx, ecx, edx;
>> + unsigned long feature_mask;
>> bool active_by_default;
>> unsigned long me_mask;
>> char buffer[16];
>> u64 msr;
>>
>> - /* Check for the SME support leaf */
>> + /*
>> + * Set the feature mask (SME or SEV) based on whether we are
>> + * running under a hypervisor.
>> + */
>> + eax = 1;
>> + ecx = 0;
>> + native_cpuid(&eax, &ebx, &ecx, &edx);
>> + feature_mask = (ecx & BIT(31)) ? AMD_SEV_FEATURE_BIT
>> + : AMD_SME_FEATURE_BIT;
>
> Set that feature mask before using it...
>
>> +
>> + /* Check for the SME/SEV support leaf */
>
> ... because if that check exits due to no SME leaf, you're uselessly
> doing all the above.
Ok, I'll move that down after the leaf check.
>
>> eax = 0x80000000;
>> ecx = 0;
>> native_cpuid(&eax, &ebx, &ecx, &edx);
>> @@ -629,24 +642,39 @@ void __init __nostackprotector sme_enable(struct boot_params *bp)
>> return;
>>
>> /*
>> - * Check for the SME feature:
>> + * Check for the SME/SEV feature:
>> * CPUID Fn8000_001F[EAX] - Bit 0
>> * Secure Memory Encryption support
>> + * CPUID Fn8000_001F[EAX] - Bit 1
>
> No need to repeat the CPUID leaf here - only Bit 1:
>
> * CPUID Fn8000_001F[EAX]
> * - Bit 0: Secure Memory Encryption support
> * - Bit 1: Secure Encrypted Virtualization support
>
Ok, I'll clean that up.
Thanks,
Tom
>
>> + * Secure Encrypted Virtualization support
>> * CPUID Fn8000_001F[EBX] - Bits 5:0
>> * Pagetable bit position used to indicate encryption
>> */
>> eax = 0x8000001f;
>> ecx = 0;
>> native_cpuid(&eax, &ebx, &ecx, &edx);
>> - if (!(eax & 1))
>> + if (!(eax & feature_mask))
>> return;
>>
>> me_mask = 1UL << (ebx & 0x3f);
>>
>> - /* Check if SME is enabled */
>> - msr = __rdmsr(MSR_K8_SYSCFG);
>> - if (!(msr & MSR_K8_SYSCFG_MEM_ENCRYPT))
>> + /* Check if memory encryption is enabled */
>> + if (feature_mask == AMD_SME_FEATURE_BIT) {
>> + /* For SME, check the SYSCFG MSR */
>> + msr = __rdmsr(MSR_K8_SYSCFG);
>> + if (!(msr & MSR_K8_SYSCFG_MEM_ENCRYPT))
>> + return;
>> + } else {
>> + /* For SEV, check the SEV MSR */
>> + msr = __rdmsr(MSR_F17H_SEV);
>> + if (!(msr & MSR_F17H_SEV_ENABLED))
>> + return;
>> +
>> + /* SEV state cannot be controlled by a command line option */
>> + sme_me_mask = me_mask;
>> + sev_enabled = 1;
>> return;
>> + }
>
> Nice. Two birds with one stone is always better. :)
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-08-24 18:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 79+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-07-24 19:07 [RFC Part1 PATCH v3 00/17] x86: Secure Encrypted Virtualization (AMD) Brijesh Singh
2017-07-24 19:07 ` [RFC Part1 PATCH v3 02/17] x86/CPU/AMD: Add the Secure Encrypted Virtualization CPU feature Brijesh Singh
[not found] ` <20170724190757.11278-3-brijesh.singh-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org>
2017-07-25 10:26 ` Borislav Petkov
[not found] ` <20170725102657.GD21822-K5JNixvcfoxupOikMc4+xw@public.gmane.org>
2017-07-25 14:29 ` Tom Lendacky
[not found] ` <7236d267-ebcb-8b45-b8d3-5955903e395f-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org>
2017-07-25 14:36 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-07-25 14:58 ` Tom Lendacky
2017-07-25 15:13 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-07-25 15:29 ` Tom Lendacky
2017-07-25 15:33 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-08-09 18:17 ` Tom Lendacky
2017-08-17 8:12 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-07-24 19:07 ` [RFC Part1 PATCH v3 03/17] x86/mm: Secure Encrypted Virtualization (SEV) support Brijesh Singh
[not found] ` <20170724190757.11278-4-brijesh.singh-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org>
2017-07-26 4:28 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-07-26 16:47 ` Tom Lendacky
[not found] ` <facf3ac6-ebda-57a7-f961-6029b3ac7be7-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org>
2017-07-27 13:39 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-07-24 19:07 ` [RFC Part1 PATCH v3 07/17] x86/mm: Include SEV for encryption memory attribute changes Brijesh Singh
[not found] ` <20170724190757.11278-8-brijesh.singh-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org>
2017-07-27 14:58 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-07-28 8:47 ` David Laight
[not found] ` <063D6719AE5E284EB5DD2968C1650D6DD0045508-VkEWCZq2GCInGFn1LkZF6NBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>
2017-08-17 18:21 ` Tom Lendacky
2017-08-17 18:10 ` Tom Lendacky
2017-07-24 19:07 ` [RFC Part1 PATCH v3 08/17] x86/efi: Access EFI data as encrypted when SEV is active Brijesh Singh
[not found] ` <20170724190757.11278-9-brijesh.singh-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org>
2017-07-28 10:31 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-08-17 18:42 ` Tom Lendacky
2017-07-24 19:07 ` [RFC Part1 PATCH v3 10/17] resource: Provide resource struct in resource walk callback Brijesh Singh
2017-07-31 8:26 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-07-31 22:19 ` Kees Cook
2017-07-24 19:07 ` [RFC Part1 PATCH v3 11/17] x86/mm, resource: Use PAGE_KERNEL protection for ioremap of memory pages Brijesh Singh
[not found] ` <20170724190757.11278-12-brijesh.singh-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org>
2017-08-02 4:02 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-08-17 19:22 ` Tom Lendacky
2017-07-24 19:07 ` [RFC Part1 PATCH v3 13/17] x86/io: Unroll string I/O when SEV is active Brijesh Singh
2017-07-25 9:51 ` David Laight
2017-07-26 10:45 ` Arnd Bergmann
[not found] ` <CAK8P3a3h7JpmkW7W=HwqAuWWmro=ngj6HSeiiML_=T82x-FtZQ-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2017-07-26 19:24 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-07-26 19:26 ` H. Peter Anvin
2017-07-26 20:07 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-07-27 7:45 ` David Laight
[not found] ` <589d65a4-eb09-bae9-e8b4-a2d78ca6b509-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org>
2017-08-22 16:52 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-09-15 12:24 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-09-15 14:13 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-09-15 14:40 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-09-15 14:48 ` Brijesh Singh
[not found] ` <ad628a45-8e4e-9cfc-2cc4-33dc6bf4613a-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org>
2017-09-15 16:22 ` Borislav Petkov
[not found] ` <20170915162256.7l4vyy4ee5zeqbir-fF5Pk5pvG8Y@public.gmane.org>
2017-09-15 16:27 ` Brijesh Singh
[not found] ` <20170724190757.11278-1-brijesh.singh-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org>
2017-07-24 19:07 ` [RFC Part1 PATCH v3 01/17] Documentation/x86: Add AMD Secure Encrypted Virtualization (SEV) descrption Brijesh Singh
[not found] ` <20170724190757.11278-2-brijesh.singh-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org>
2017-07-25 5:45 ` Borislav Petkov
[not found] ` <20170725054522.GA21822-K5JNixvcfoxupOikMc4+xw@public.gmane.org>
2017-07-25 14:59 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-07-24 19:07 ` [RFC Part1 PATCH v3 04/17] x86/mm: Don't attempt to encrypt initrd under SEV Brijesh Singh
2017-07-26 14:44 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-07-24 19:07 ` [RFC Part1 PATCH v3 05/17] x86, realmode: Don't decrypt trampoline area " Brijesh Singh
[not found] ` <20170724190757.11278-6-brijesh.singh-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org>
2017-07-26 16:03 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-08-10 13:03 ` Tom Lendacky
2017-07-24 19:07 ` [RFC Part1 PATCH v3 06/17] x86/mm: Use encrypted access of boot related data with SEV Brijesh Singh
2017-07-27 13:31 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-08-17 18:05 ` Tom Lendacky
2017-07-24 19:07 ` [RFC Part1 PATCH v3 09/17] resource: Consolidate resource walking code Brijesh Singh
2017-07-28 15:23 ` Borislav Petkov
[not found] ` <20170728152342.GB11564-K5JNixvcfoxupOikMc4+xw@public.gmane.org>
2017-08-17 18:55 ` Tom Lendacky
2017-08-17 19:03 ` Tom Lendacky
2017-07-24 19:07 ` [RFC Part1 PATCH v3 12/17] x86/mm: DMA support for SEV memory encryption Brijesh Singh
2017-08-07 3:48 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-08-17 19:35 ` Tom Lendacky
2017-07-24 19:07 ` [RFC Part1 PATCH v3 14/17] x86/boot: Add early boot support when running with SEV active Brijesh Singh
2017-08-23 15:30 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-08-24 18:54 ` Tom Lendacky [this message]
[not found] ` <42cf82fc-03be-c4c7-eaab-b2306a049d20-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org>
2017-08-25 12:54 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-07-24 19:07 ` [RFC Part1 PATCH v3 17/17] X86/KVM: Clear encryption attribute when SEV is active Brijesh Singh
[not found] ` <20170724190757.11278-18-brijesh.singh-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org>
2017-08-31 15:06 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-07-24 19:07 ` [RFC Part1 PATCH v3 15/17] x86: Add support for changing memory encryption attribute in early boot Brijesh Singh
2017-08-28 10:51 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-08-28 11:49 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-07-24 19:07 ` [RFC Part1 PATCH v3 16/17] X86/KVM: Provide support to create Guest and HV shared per-CPU variables Brijesh Singh
2017-08-29 10:22 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-08-30 16:18 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-08-30 17:46 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-09-01 22:52 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-09-02 3:21 ` Andy Lutomirski
[not found] ` <CALCETrV+rv=9Rg5V1z8vHtVDW64eCNtZHQMW8DipRADvm+qP5A-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2017-09-03 2:34 ` Brijesh Singh
[not found] ` <8155b5b2-b2b3-bc8f-33ae-b81b661a2e38-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org>
2017-09-04 17:05 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-09-04 17:47 ` Brijesh Singh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=42cf82fc-03be-c4c7-eaab-b2306a049d20@amd.com \
--to=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arbab@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org \
--cc=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bp@suse.de \
--cc=brijesh.singh@amd.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=labbott@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-efi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=matt@codeblueprint.co.uk \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=piotr.luc@intel.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox