From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Chris Friesen Subject: Re: [RFC] Second attempt at kernel secure boot support Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2012 09:14:14 -0600 Message-ID: <50992946.4060101@genband.com> References: <20121104135251.GA17894@srcf.ucam.org> <87d2zsmv8r.fsf@xmission.com> <509766DB.9090906@zytor.com> <87625kh5r2.fsf@xmission.com> <20121105123858.GB4374@srcf.ucam.org> <87sj8nc137.fsf@xmission.com> <20121105202557.GA16076@srcf.ucam.org> <87hap3zbw7.fsf@xmission.com> <20121106031219.GB24235@srcf.ucam.org> <87fw4nv1vj.fsf@xmission.com> <20121106035352.GA24698@srcf.ucam.org> <87hap3s3yl.fsf@xmission.com> <878vafqi5q.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <878vafqi5q.fsf-ZqZwdwZz9NfTBotR3TxKnbNAH6kLmebB@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-efi-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Florian Weimer Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" , Matthew Garrett , "H. Peter Anvin" , James Bottomley , Pavel Machek , Eric Paris , Jiri Kosina , Oliver Neukum , Alan Cox , Josh Boyer , linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-security-module-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-efi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-efi@vger.kernel.org On 11/06/2012 01:56 AM, Florian Weimer wrote: > Personally, I think the only way out of this mess is to teach users > how to disable Secure Boot. If you're going to go that far, why not just get them to install a RedHat (or SuSE, or Ubuntu, or whoever) key and use that instead? Secure boot does arguably solve a class of problems, so it seems a bit odd to recommend just throwing it out entirely. Chris