* [PATCH] x86, efi: Make "noefi" really disable EFI runtime serivces
@ 2013-02-20 20:36 Matt Fleming
[not found] ` <1361392572-25657-1-git-send-email-matt-HNK1S37rvNbeXh+fF434Mdi2O/JbrIOy@public.gmane.org>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Matt Fleming @ 2013-02-20 20:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: H. Peter Anvin
Cc: linux-kernel, linux-efi, Matt Fleming, Satoru Takeuchi, stable
From: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com>
commit 1de63d60cd5b ("efi: Clear EFI_RUNTIME_SERVICES rather than
EFI_BOOT by "noefi" boot parameter") attempted to make "noefi" true to
its documentation and disable EFI runtime services to prevent the
bricking bug described in commit e0094244e41c ("samsung-laptop:
Disable on EFI hardware"). However, it's not possible to clear
EFI_RUNTIME_SERVICES from an early param function because
EFI_RUNTIME_SERVICES is set in efi_init() *after* parse_early_param().
This resulted in "noefi" effectively becoming a no-op and no longer
providing users with a way to disable EFI, which is bad for those
users that have buggy machines.
Reported-by: Walt Nelson Jr <walt0924@gmail.com>
Cc: Satoru Takeuchi <takeuchi_satoru@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com>
---
arch/x86/platform/efi/efi.c | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/platform/efi/efi.c b/arch/x86/platform/efi/efi.c
index 928bf83..e2cd38f 100644
--- a/arch/x86/platform/efi/efi.c
+++ b/arch/x86/platform/efi/efi.c
@@ -85,9 +85,10 @@ int efi_enabled(int facility)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(efi_enabled);
+static bool disable_runtime = false;
static int __init setup_noefi(char *arg)
{
- clear_bit(EFI_RUNTIME_SERVICES, &x86_efi_facility);
+ disable_runtime = true;
return 0;
}
early_param("noefi", setup_noefi);
@@ -734,7 +735,7 @@ void __init efi_init(void)
if (!efi_is_native())
pr_info("No EFI runtime due to 32/64-bit mismatch with kernel\n");
else {
- if (efi_runtime_init())
+ if (disable_runtime || efi_runtime_init())
return;
set_bit(EFI_RUNTIME_SERVICES, &x86_efi_facility);
}
--
1.7.11.7
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] x86, efi: Make "noefi" really disable EFI runtime serivces
[not found] ` <1361392572-25657-1-git-send-email-matt-HNK1S37rvNbeXh+fF434Mdi2O/JbrIOy@public.gmane.org>
@ 2013-02-20 23:46 ` Satoru Takeuchi
2013-02-20 23:50 ` H. Peter Anvin
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Satoru Takeuchi @ 2013-02-20 23:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Matt Fleming
Cc: H. Peter Anvin, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA,
linux-efi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, Matt Fleming,
stable-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA
Hi Matt,
(2013/02/21 5:36), Matt Fleming wrote:
> From: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
>
> commit 1de63d60cd5b ("efi: Clear EFI_RUNTIME_SERVICES rather than
> EFI_BOOT by "noefi" boot parameter") attempted to make "noefi" true to
> its documentation and disable EFI runtime services to prevent the
> bricking bug described in commit e0094244e41c ("samsung-laptop:
> Disable on EFI hardware"). However, it's not possible to clear
> EFI_RUNTIME_SERVICES from an early param function because
> EFI_RUNTIME_SERVICES is set in efi_init() *after* parse_early_param().
>
> This resulted in "noefi" effectively becoming a no-op and no longer
> providing users with a way to disable EFI, which is bad for those
> users that have buggy machines.
Sorry, my patch was imperfect. This patch looks good to me.
Reviewed-by: Satoru Takeuchi <takeuchi_satoru-+CUm20s59erQFUHtdCDX3A@public.gmane.org>
Thanks,
Satoru
>
> Reported-by: Walt Nelson Jr <walt0924-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> Cc: Satoru Takeuchi <takeuchi_satoru-+CUm20s59erQFUHtdCDX3A@public.gmane.org>
> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org>
> Cc: <stable-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>
> Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> ---
> arch/x86/platform/efi/efi.c | 5 +++--
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/platform/efi/efi.c b/arch/x86/platform/efi/efi.c
> index 928bf83..e2cd38f 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/platform/efi/efi.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/platform/efi/efi.c
> @@ -85,9 +85,10 @@ int efi_enabled(int facility)
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(efi_enabled);
>
> +static bool disable_runtime = false;
> static int __init setup_noefi(char *arg)
> {
> - clear_bit(EFI_RUNTIME_SERVICES, &x86_efi_facility);
> + disable_runtime = true;
> return 0;
> }
> early_param("noefi", setup_noefi);
> @@ -734,7 +735,7 @@ void __init efi_init(void)
> if (!efi_is_native())
> pr_info("No EFI runtime due to 32/64-bit mismatch with kernel\n");
> else {
> - if (efi_runtime_init())
> + if (disable_runtime || efi_runtime_init())
> return;
> set_bit(EFI_RUNTIME_SERVICES, &x86_efi_facility);
> }
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] x86, efi: Make "noefi" really disable EFI runtime serivces
2013-02-20 23:46 ` Satoru Takeuchi
@ 2013-02-20 23:50 ` H. Peter Anvin
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: H. Peter Anvin @ 2013-02-20 23:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Satoru Takeuchi
Cc: Matt Fleming, linux-kernel, linux-efi, Matt Fleming, stable
On 02/20/2013 03:46 PM, Satoru Takeuchi wrote:
>
> Sorry, my patch was imperfect. This patch looks good to me.
>
Perfection is something very rarely achieved. That's why we work with
gradual improvements.
-hpa
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2013-02-20 23:50 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2013-02-20 20:36 [PATCH] x86, efi: Make "noefi" really disable EFI runtime serivces Matt Fleming
[not found] ` <1361392572-25657-1-git-send-email-matt-HNK1S37rvNbeXh+fF434Mdi2O/JbrIOy@public.gmane.org>
2013-02-20 23:46 ` Satoru Takeuchi
2013-02-20 23:50 ` H. Peter Anvin
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).