From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matt Fleming Subject: Re: Curious crash with secure variables Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2013 15:02:25 +0000 Message-ID: <51472C81.5020801@console-pimps.org> References: <1363593684.2412.5.camel@dabdike.int.hansenpartnership.com> <1363607345.15011.339.camel@mfleming-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com> <1363616613.2412.19.camel@dabdike.int.hansenpartnership.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1363616613.2412.19.camel-sFMDBYUN5F8GjUHQrlYNx2Wm91YjaHnnhRte9Li2A+AAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-efi-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: James Bottomley Cc: linux-efi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Jordan L Justen List-Id: linux-efi@vger.kernel.org On 03/18/2013 02:23 PM, James Bottomley wrote: > Yes, it's a phenomenally complicated operation from looking at the > TianoCore source ... might we not be better off not bothering to > relocate and just using a private physical mapping for the calls? Yeah, there have been various discussions about doing this. I sent some patches last year but they broke various non-EFI machines and I haven't had chance to pick it up again. -- Matt Fleming, Intel Open Source Technology Center