From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matt Fleming Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86,efi: Implement efi_no_storage_paranoia parameter Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2013 15:55:36 +0100 Message-ID: <516EB7E8.1030105@console-pimps.org> References: <1366153253-28572-1-git-send-email-richard@nod.at> <516E500E.3020909@nod.at> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <516E500E.3020909@nod.at> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Richard Weinberger Cc: Jiri Kosina , matt.fleming@intel.com, cbouatmailru@gmail.com, ccross@android.com, keescook@chromium.org, tony.luck@intel.com, linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, matthew.garrett@nebula.com List-Id: linux-efi@vger.kernel.org On 17/04/13 08:32, Richard Weinberger wrote: > Am 17.04.2013 01:16, schrieb Jiri Kosina: >> On Wed, 17 Apr 2013, Richard Weinberger wrote: >>> +static bool efi_no_storage_paranoia; >>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(efi_no_storage_paranoia); >> >> Is there any particular reason to export this symbol? > > I saw that the other parameters in that file are exported too > and other (efi) drivers may also be interested in that symbol. > So I thought it is a good idea to export it too. I've applied this patch but I did drop the EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL() line. If people want access to this symbol at some future date we can address that later. Thanks! -- Matt Fleming, Intel Open Source Technology Center