From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Vrabel Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v5 2/7] efi: Introduce EFI_NO_DIRECT flag Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2014 11:52:33 +0100 Message-ID: <539ECC71.7080008@citrix.com> References: <1402678823-24589-1-git-send-email-daniel.kiper@oracle.com> <1402678823-24589-3-git-send-email-daniel.kiper@oracle.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1402678823-24589-3-git-send-email-daniel.kiper-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-efi-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Daniel Kiper , linux-efi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, x86-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org, xen-devel-GuqFBffKawtpuQazS67q72D2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org Cc: mjg59-1xO5oi07KQx4cg9Nei1l7Q@public.gmane.org, jeremy-TSDbQ3PG+2Y@public.gmane.org, matt.fleming-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org, ian.campbell-Sxgqhf6Nn4DQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org, andrew.cooper3-Sxgqhf6Nn4DQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org, stefano.stabellini-mvvWK6WmYclDPfheJLI6IQ@public.gmane.org, mingo-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org, david.vrabel-Sxgqhf6Nn4DQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org, jbeulich-IBi9RG/b67k@public.gmane.org, hpa-YMNOUZJC4hwAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org, boris.ostrovsky-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org, tglx-hfZtesqFncYOwBW4kG4KsQ@public.gmane.org, eshelton-e+AXbWqSrlAAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-efi@vger.kernel.org On 13/06/14 18:00, Daniel Kiper wrote: > Introduce EFI_NO_DIRECT flag. EFI_PARAVIRT would be a clearer name I think. > +#define EFI_NO_DIRECT 6 /* Can we access EFI directly? */ #define EFI_PARAVIRT 6 /* Access is via a paravirt interface */ David