From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Prarit Bhargava Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86, efi: print debug values in Kib not MB Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2014 19:03:51 -0400 Message-ID: <53D82857.4020806@redhat.com> References: <1406653761-3884-1-git-send-email-prarit@redhat.com> <20140729222932.GA17481@pd.tnic> <53D82118.6090202@redhat.com> <20140729223603.GC17241@pd.tnic> <20140729230102.GD17241@pd.tnic> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20140729230102.GD17241-fF5Pk5pvG8Y@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-efi-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Borislav Petkov Cc: David Rientjes , linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, lszubowi-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org, Matt Fleming , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , x86-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org, linux-efi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-efi@vger.kernel.org On 07/29/2014 07:01 PM, Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 03:42:55PM -0700, David Rientjes wrote: >> If Prarit is going to implement this suggested reverse memparse() ... > > The only meaningful argument about the formatting here IMO is what > people staring at this output are going to understand from it. > > And since those people most often tend to be the poor souls dealing with > UEFI, we should ask them whether this needs fixing and if so, how. > ... I did do a get_maintainers.pl on this before sending it. Did I miss someone or some list? :( P. > That's it. >