From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Paolo Bonzini Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 14/32] x86: mm: Provide support to use memblock when spliting large pages Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2017 13:28:01 +0100 Message-ID: <55f528b7-da06-2506-2cd0-56b9493347f0@redhat.com> References: <148846752022.2349.13667498174822419498.stgit@brijesh-build-machine> <148846771545.2349.9373586041426414252.stgit@brijesh-build-machine> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <148846771545.2349.9373586041426414252.stgit@brijesh-build-machine> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: driverdev-devel-bounces@linuxdriverproject.org Sender: "devel" To: Brijesh Singh , simon.guinot@sequanux.org, linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, rkrcmar@redhat.com, matt@codeblueprint.co.uk, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linus.walleij@linaro.org, gary.hook@amd.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, paul.gortmaker@windriver.com, hpa@zytor.com, cl@linux.com, dan.j.williams@intel.com, aarcange@redhat.com, sfr@canb.auug.org.au, andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com, herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, bhe@redhat.com, xemul@parallels.com, joro@8bytes.org, x86@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org, piotr.luc@intel.com, mingo@redhat.com, msalter@redhat.com, ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com, bp@suse.de, dyoung@redhat.com, thomas.lendacky@amd.com, jroedel@suse.de, keescook@chromium.org, arnd@arndb.de, toshi.kani@hpe.com, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com, luto@kernel.org, devel@linuxdriverproject.org, bhelgaas@google.com, tglx@linutronix.de, mcheha List-Id: linux-efi@vger.kernel.org On 02/03/2017 16:15, Brijesh Singh wrote: > > __split_large_page(struct cpa_data *cpa, pte_t *kpte, unsigned long address, > - struct page *base) > + pte_t *pbase, unsigned long new_pfn) > { > - pte_t *pbase = (pte_t *)page_address(base); Just one comment and I'll reply to Boris, I think you can compute pbase with pfn_to_kaddr, and avoid adding a new argument. > */ > - __set_pmd_pte(kpte, address, mk_pte(base, __pgprot(_KERNPG_TABLE))); > + __set_pmd_pte(kpte, address, > + native_make_pte((new_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT) + _KERNPG_TABLE)); And this probably is better written as: __set_pmd_pte(kpte, address, pfn_pte(new_pfn, __pgprot(_KERNPG_TABLE)); Paolo