From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
To: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com>,
Smita Koralahalli <Smita.KoralahalliChannabasappa@amd.com>,
Shiju Jose <shiju.jose@huawei.com>
Cc: Yazen Ghannam <yazen.ghannam@amd.com>,
Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>,
Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>,
Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@intel.com>,
Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>,
"Ard Biesheuvel" <ardb@kernel.org>, <linux-efi@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org>,
Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v5 9/9] cxl/pci: Register for and process CPER events
Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2024 14:08:02 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6595dac27b081_8dc68294e3@dwillia2-xfh.jf.intel.com.notmuch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231220-cxl-cper-v5-9-1bb8a4ca2c7a@intel.com>
Ira Weiny wrote:
> If the firmware has configured CXL event support to be firmware first
> the OS can process those events through CPER records. The CXL layer has
> unique DPA to HPA knowledge and standard event trace parsing in place.
>
> CPER records contain Bus, Device, Function information which can be used
> to identify the PCI device which is sending the event.
>
> Change the PCI driver registration to include registration of a CXL
> CPER callback to process events through the trace subsystem.
>
> Use new scoped based management to simplify the handling of the PCI
> device object.
>
> NOTE this patch depends on Dan's addition of a device guard[1].
Now that you added guard(pci_dev) earlier in the series you can just use
that here rather than guard(device).
[..]
> +#define CXL_EVENT_HDR_FLAGS_REC_SEVERITY GENMASK(1, 0)
> +static void cxl_cper_event_call(enum cxl_event_type ev_type,
> + struct cxl_cper_event_rec *rec)
> +{
> + struct cper_cxl_event_devid *device_id = &rec->hdr.device_id;
> + struct pci_dev *pdev __free(pci_dev_put) = NULL;
> + enum cxl_event_log_type log_type;
> + struct cxl_dev_state *cxlds;
> + unsigned int devfn;
> + u32 hdr_flags;
> +
> + devfn = PCI_DEVFN(device_id->device_num, device_id->func_num);
> + pdev = pci_get_domain_bus_and_slot(device_id->segment_num,
> + device_id->bus_num, devfn);
> + if (!pdev)
> + return;
> +
> + guard(device)(&pdev->dev);
Per above:
guard(pci_dev)(pdev);
> + if (pdev->driver != &cxl_pci_driver)
> + return;
> +
> + cxlds = pci_get_drvdata(pdev);
> + if (!cxlds)
> + return;
> +
> + /* Fabricate a log type */
> + hdr_flags = get_unaligned_le24(rec->event.generic.hdr.flags);
> + log_type = FIELD_GET(CXL_EVENT_HDR_FLAGS_REC_SEVERITY, hdr_flags);
> +
> + cxl_event_trace_record(cxlds->cxlmd, log_type, ev_type,
> + &uuid_null, &rec->event);
> +}
> +
> +static int __init cxl_pci_driver_init(void)
> +{
> + int rc;
> +
> + rc = pci_register_driver(&cxl_pci_driver);
> + if (rc)
> + return rc;
> +
> + rc = cxl_cper_register_callback(cxl_cper_event_call);
> + if (rc)
> + pci_unregister_driver(&cxl_pci_driver);
I think this order should be flipped. That way any errors that might
arrive due to activity caused by probing have a chance to be serviced.
Any that fire while initial probing is happening will pause in
cxl_cper_event_call() and wait for probing to complete. Of course if
probing fails, all is lost, but I think there is some incremental
benefit to trying to catch those early records for things that are not
probing fatal.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-03 22:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-12-21 0:17 [PATCH v5 0/9] efi/cxl-cper: Report CPER CXL component events through trace events Ira Weiny
2023-12-21 0:17 ` [PATCH v5 1/9] cxl/trace: Pass uuid explicitly to event traces Ira Weiny
2024-01-08 12:56 ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-12-21 0:17 ` [PATCH v5 2/9] cxl/events: Promote CXL event structures to a core header Ira Weiny
2024-01-08 13:05 ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-12-21 0:17 ` [PATCH v5 3/9] cxl/events: Create common event UUID defines Ira Weiny
2024-01-08 13:07 ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-12-21 0:17 ` [PATCH v5 4/9] cxl/events: Remove passing a UUID to known event traces Ira Weiny
2024-01-08 13:23 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-01-09 23:38 ` Dan Williams
2024-01-10 14:22 ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-12-21 0:17 ` [PATCH v5 5/9] cxl/events: Separate UUID from event structures Ira Weiny
2024-01-08 13:27 ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-12-21 0:17 ` [PATCH v5 6/9] cxl/events: Create a CXL event union Ira Weiny
2024-01-08 13:31 ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-12-21 0:17 ` [PATCH v5 7/9] acpi/ghes: Process CXL Component Events Ira Weiny
2024-01-08 13:41 ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-12-21 0:17 ` [PATCH v5 8/9] PCI: Define scoped based management functions Ira Weiny
2024-01-03 22:38 ` Dan Williams
2024-01-03 23:01 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2024-01-04 0:21 ` Dan Williams
2024-01-04 17:17 ` Ira Weiny
2024-01-04 18:32 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2024-01-04 18:59 ` Dan Williams
2024-01-04 21:46 ` Ira Weiny
2024-01-04 22:37 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2024-01-04 23:00 ` Ira Weiny
2024-01-04 6:05 ` Lukas Wunner
2024-01-04 6:43 ` Dan Williams
2024-01-04 7:02 ` Lukas Wunner
2024-01-04 7:37 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2024-01-04 17:41 ` Dan Williams
2024-01-08 13:44 ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-12-21 0:17 ` [PATCH v5 9/9] cxl/pci: Register for and process CPER events Ira Weiny
2024-01-02 15:14 ` Smita Koralahalli
2024-01-02 20:29 ` Ira Weiny
2024-01-03 22:08 ` Dan Williams [this message]
2024-01-04 18:31 ` Ira Weiny
2024-01-08 13:50 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-01-09 23:59 ` Dan Williams
2024-01-04 22:55 ` [PATCH v5 0/9] efi/cxl-cper: Report CPER CXL component events through trace events Bjorn Helgaas
2024-01-08 16:58 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-01-08 20:04 ` Smita Koralahalli
2024-01-09 2:08 ` Dan Williams
2024-01-09 2:32 ` Ira Weiny
2024-01-09 2:59 ` Dan Williams
2024-01-09 16:04 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-01-09 20:49 ` Dan Williams
2024-01-09 23:30 ` Dan Williams
2024-01-09 23:31 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2024-01-10 14:24 ` Jonathan Cameron
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6595dac27b081_8dc68294e3@dwillia2-xfh.jf.intel.com.notmuch \
--to=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=Smita.KoralahalliChannabasappa@amd.com \
--cc=alison.schofield@intel.com \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
--cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
--cc=ira.weiny@intel.com \
--cc=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-efi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shiju.jose@huawei.com \
--cc=vishal.l.verma@intel.com \
--cc=yazen.ghannam@amd.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox