From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87E68C47404 for ; Fri, 11 Oct 2019 14:31:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6811F21D56 for ; Fri, 11 Oct 2019 14:31:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728561AbfJKOba (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Oct 2019 10:31:30 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:41602 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728215AbfJKOb3 (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Oct 2019 10:31:29 -0400 Received: from mail-ed1-f70.google.com (mail-ed1-f70.google.com [209.85.208.70]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7B49B79705 for ; Fri, 11 Oct 2019 14:31:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ed1-f70.google.com with SMTP id m2so5865861eds.12 for ; Fri, 11 Oct 2019 07:31:29 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=e7jeAeBI7smw0DkvEKb+yEiLD6lnpDm/GMM/0BPj+Sg=; b=svTMcvHFZzfsuJeI0tcngfzXstq81QVnDtyXrmtY0W3U617Nz750gqGq62dmLAzuuN sQ6UEUE57yYU3LoWbRjaTPZKIOxZ/Aba5kvo/bZmRPFr7Hfo1gr9uEXAwcjtvxw8Dt9j it/8VrvdzY+Lcuy4va/IG6+LYfVe++VYugvirR9VaBOkn9UyLo5DboHBbJZpsFN1CQ7a lbYFaW3G1ncBYnOPoq0oP2OqJR676u9OIkl+8DZNglaI4Hp3QxnApTZvItzkhkm6TFQU P0tNT27qRiEvfnLGXFaP3IsgyvlM/4Y0M60st3/E4D4FLSuXBAQ2pd6IIykhjSeoYONR NmnQ== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWDAV/60cIVpvm/HD/tqdyYgl5+G6w20yAfS21cEOHVkC9AEi7n UVRQt17XFY3hAaaBuAXq+r25rRTSSjxDP2sGAVLQCRPegia/f7Y7ksrrtSPcDwLKHbt6Lku/CXX iYcFIQwZhYAiIwbKK/VPr X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:2319:: with SMTP id l25mr14159771eja.309.1570804288242; Fri, 11 Oct 2019 07:31:28 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwoRZoAH1NMErSVdJalwF7TdgOzUSOFWLs4mQa22TgCcFbTlVZIC719vTCBSczupc1e7bsjHQ== X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:2319:: with SMTP id l25mr14159752eja.309.1570804288071; Fri, 11 Oct 2019 07:31:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dhcp-44-196.space.revspace.nl ([2a0e:5700:4:11:6eb:1143:b8be:2b8]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id s22sm1224314eja.91.2019.10.11.07.31.26 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 11 Oct 2019 07:31:27 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 0/8] efi/firmware/platform-x86: Add EFI embedded fw support To: Luis Chamberlain Cc: Ard Biesheuvel , Darren Hart , Andy Shevchenko , Greg Kroah-Hartman , "Rafael J . Wysocki" , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , Borislav Petkov , "H . Peter Anvin" , Jonathan Corbet , Dmitry Torokhov , Peter Jones , Dave Olsthoorn , x86@kernel.org, platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org, linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-input@vger.kernel.org References: <20191004145056.43267-1-hdegoede@redhat.com> <20191011141036.GK16384@42.do-not-panic.com> From: Hans de Goede Message-ID: <7fed4882-efa7-18d0-1ef6-9138fbdddfc4@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2019 16:31:26 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20191011141036.GK16384@42.do-not-panic.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-efi-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-efi@vger.kernel.org Hi, On 10/11/19 4:10 PM, Luis Chamberlain wrote: > Hey Hans, thanks for staying on top of this and follow up! For some > reason the universe conspired against your first and last patch ([1/8], > [8/8]), and I never got them. Could you bounce these or resend in case > others confirm they also didn't get it? I have received feedback from others on the first patch, so at least that one has reached others. I've bounced patches 1 and 8 to you. > While at it, can you Cc scott.branden@broadcom.com in further > communications about this patchset, he's interest in some other changes > we'll need to coordinate if we get to have some other development in > line for the next merge window. Will do. Regards, Hans