From: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>, Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>, Piotr Luc <piotr.luc@intel.com>,
Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>,
Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>,
Reza Arbab <arbab@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk>,
"Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>,
Laura Abbott <labbott@redhat.com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Eric Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
Benjamin
Subject: Re: [RFC Part1 PATCH v3 06/17] x86/mm: Use encrypted access of boot related data with SEV
Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2017 13:05:38 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8b2c75e2-6ed9-ed7d-ff62-39df8aedc12c@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170727133125.GB28553@nazgul.tnic>
On 7/27/2017 8:31 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 02:07:46PM -0500, Brijesh Singh wrote:
>> From: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
>>
>> When Secure Encrypted Virtualization (SEV) is active, boot data (such as
>> EFI related data, setup data) is encrypted and needs to be accessed as
>> such when mapped. Update the architecture override in early_memremap to
>> keep the encryption attribute when mapping this data.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>
>> ---
>> arch/x86/mm/ioremap.c | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
>> 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> ...
>
>> @@ -590,10 +598,15 @@ bool arch_memremap_can_ram_remap(resource_size_t phys_addr, unsigned long size,
>> if (flags & MEMREMAP_DEC)
>> return false;
>>
>> - if (memremap_is_setup_data(phys_addr, size) ||
>> - memremap_is_efi_data(phys_addr, size) ||
>> - memremap_should_map_decrypted(phys_addr, size))
>> - return false;
>> + if (sme_active()) {
>> + if (memremap_is_setup_data(phys_addr, size) ||
>> + memremap_is_efi_data(phys_addr, size) ||
>> + memremap_should_map_decrypted(phys_addr, size))
>> + return false;
>> + } else if (sev_active()) {
>> + if (memremap_should_map_decrypted(phys_addr, size))
>> + return false;
>> + }
>>
>> return true;
>> }
>
> I guess this function's hind part can be simplified to:
>
> if (sme_active()) {
> if (memremap_is_setup_data(phys_addr, size) ||
> memremap_is_efi_data(phys_addr, size))
> return false;
> }
>
> return ! memremap_should_map_decrypted(phys_addr, size);
> }
>
Ok, definitely cleaner.
>> @@ -608,15 +621,22 @@ pgprot_t __init early_memremap_pgprot_adjust(resource_size_t phys_addr,
>> unsigned long size,
>> pgprot_t prot)
>
> And this one in a similar manner...
>
>> {
>> - if (!sme_active())
>> + if (!sme_active() && !sev_active())
>> return prot;
>
> ... and you don't need that check...
>
>> - if (early_memremap_is_setup_data(phys_addr, size) ||
>> - memremap_is_efi_data(phys_addr, size) ||
>> - memremap_should_map_decrypted(phys_addr, size))
>> - prot = pgprot_decrypted(prot);
>> - else
>> - prot = pgprot_encrypted(prot);
>> + if (sme_active()) {
>
> ... if you're going to do it here too.
>
>> + if (early_memremap_is_setup_data(phys_addr, size) ||
>> + memremap_is_efi_data(phys_addr, size) ||
>> + memremap_should_map_decrypted(phys_addr, size))
>> + prot = pgprot_decrypted(prot);
>> + else
>> + prot = pgprot_encrypted(prot);
>> + } else if (sev_active()) {
>
> And here.
Will do.
Thanks,
Tom
>
>> + if (memremap_should_map_decrypted(phys_addr, size))
>> + prot = pgprot_decrypted(prot);
>> + else
>> + prot = pgprot_encrypted(prot);
>> + }
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-08-17 18:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 79+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-07-24 19:07 [RFC Part1 PATCH v3 00/17] x86: Secure Encrypted Virtualization (AMD) Brijesh Singh
[not found] ` <20170724190757.11278-1-brijesh.singh-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org>
2017-07-24 19:07 ` [RFC Part1 PATCH v3 01/17] Documentation/x86: Add AMD Secure Encrypted Virtualization (SEV) descrption Brijesh Singh
[not found] ` <20170724190757.11278-2-brijesh.singh-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org>
2017-07-25 5:45 ` Borislav Petkov
[not found] ` <20170725054522.GA21822-K5JNixvcfoxupOikMc4+xw@public.gmane.org>
2017-07-25 14:59 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-07-24 19:07 ` [RFC Part1 PATCH v3 04/17] x86/mm: Don't attempt to encrypt initrd under SEV Brijesh Singh
2017-07-26 14:44 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-07-24 19:07 ` [RFC Part1 PATCH v3 05/17] x86, realmode: Don't decrypt trampoline area " Brijesh Singh
[not found] ` <20170724190757.11278-6-brijesh.singh-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org>
2017-07-26 16:03 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-08-10 13:03 ` Tom Lendacky
2017-07-24 19:07 ` [RFC Part1 PATCH v3 06/17] x86/mm: Use encrypted access of boot related data with SEV Brijesh Singh
2017-07-27 13:31 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-08-17 18:05 ` Tom Lendacky [this message]
2017-07-24 19:07 ` [RFC Part1 PATCH v3 09/17] resource: Consolidate resource walking code Brijesh Singh
2017-07-28 15:23 ` Borislav Petkov
[not found] ` <20170728152342.GB11564-K5JNixvcfoxupOikMc4+xw@public.gmane.org>
2017-08-17 18:55 ` Tom Lendacky
2017-08-17 19:03 ` Tom Lendacky
2017-07-24 19:07 ` [RFC Part1 PATCH v3 12/17] x86/mm: DMA support for SEV memory encryption Brijesh Singh
2017-08-07 3:48 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-08-17 19:35 ` Tom Lendacky
2017-07-24 19:07 ` [RFC Part1 PATCH v3 14/17] x86/boot: Add early boot support when running with SEV active Brijesh Singh
2017-08-23 15:30 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-08-24 18:54 ` Tom Lendacky
[not found] ` <42cf82fc-03be-c4c7-eaab-b2306a049d20-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org>
2017-08-25 12:54 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-07-24 19:07 ` [RFC Part1 PATCH v3 17/17] X86/KVM: Clear encryption attribute when SEV is active Brijesh Singh
[not found] ` <20170724190757.11278-18-brijesh.singh-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org>
2017-08-31 15:06 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-07-24 19:07 ` [RFC Part1 PATCH v3 02/17] x86/CPU/AMD: Add the Secure Encrypted Virtualization CPU feature Brijesh Singh
[not found] ` <20170724190757.11278-3-brijesh.singh-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org>
2017-07-25 10:26 ` Borislav Petkov
[not found] ` <20170725102657.GD21822-K5JNixvcfoxupOikMc4+xw@public.gmane.org>
2017-07-25 14:29 ` Tom Lendacky
[not found] ` <7236d267-ebcb-8b45-b8d3-5955903e395f-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org>
2017-07-25 14:36 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-07-25 14:58 ` Tom Lendacky
2017-07-25 15:13 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-07-25 15:29 ` Tom Lendacky
2017-07-25 15:33 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-08-09 18:17 ` Tom Lendacky
2017-08-17 8:12 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-07-24 19:07 ` [RFC Part1 PATCH v3 03/17] x86/mm: Secure Encrypted Virtualization (SEV) support Brijesh Singh
[not found] ` <20170724190757.11278-4-brijesh.singh-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org>
2017-07-26 4:28 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-07-26 16:47 ` Tom Lendacky
[not found] ` <facf3ac6-ebda-57a7-f961-6029b3ac7be7-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org>
2017-07-27 13:39 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-07-24 19:07 ` [RFC Part1 PATCH v3 07/17] x86/mm: Include SEV for encryption memory attribute changes Brijesh Singh
[not found] ` <20170724190757.11278-8-brijesh.singh-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org>
2017-07-27 14:58 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-07-28 8:47 ` David Laight
[not found] ` <063D6719AE5E284EB5DD2968C1650D6DD0045508-VkEWCZq2GCInGFn1LkZF6NBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>
2017-08-17 18:21 ` Tom Lendacky
2017-08-17 18:10 ` Tom Lendacky
2017-07-24 19:07 ` [RFC Part1 PATCH v3 08/17] x86/efi: Access EFI data as encrypted when SEV is active Brijesh Singh
[not found] ` <20170724190757.11278-9-brijesh.singh-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org>
2017-07-28 10:31 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-08-17 18:42 ` Tom Lendacky
2017-07-24 19:07 ` [RFC Part1 PATCH v3 10/17] resource: Provide resource struct in resource walk callback Brijesh Singh
2017-07-31 8:26 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-07-31 22:19 ` Kees Cook
2017-07-24 19:07 ` [RFC Part1 PATCH v3 11/17] x86/mm, resource: Use PAGE_KERNEL protection for ioremap of memory pages Brijesh Singh
[not found] ` <20170724190757.11278-12-brijesh.singh-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org>
2017-08-02 4:02 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-08-17 19:22 ` Tom Lendacky
2017-07-24 19:07 ` [RFC Part1 PATCH v3 13/17] x86/io: Unroll string I/O when SEV is active Brijesh Singh
2017-07-25 9:51 ` David Laight
2017-07-26 10:45 ` Arnd Bergmann
[not found] ` <CAK8P3a3h7JpmkW7W=HwqAuWWmro=ngj6HSeiiML_=T82x-FtZQ-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2017-07-26 19:24 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-07-26 19:26 ` H. Peter Anvin
2017-07-26 20:07 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-07-27 7:45 ` David Laight
[not found] ` <589d65a4-eb09-bae9-e8b4-a2d78ca6b509-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org>
2017-08-22 16:52 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-09-15 12:24 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-09-15 14:13 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-09-15 14:40 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-09-15 14:48 ` Brijesh Singh
[not found] ` <ad628a45-8e4e-9cfc-2cc4-33dc6bf4613a-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org>
2017-09-15 16:22 ` Borislav Petkov
[not found] ` <20170915162256.7l4vyy4ee5zeqbir-fF5Pk5pvG8Y@public.gmane.org>
2017-09-15 16:27 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-07-24 19:07 ` [RFC Part1 PATCH v3 15/17] x86: Add support for changing memory encryption attribute in early boot Brijesh Singh
2017-08-28 10:51 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-08-28 11:49 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-07-24 19:07 ` [RFC Part1 PATCH v3 16/17] X86/KVM: Provide support to create Guest and HV shared per-CPU variables Brijesh Singh
2017-08-29 10:22 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-08-30 16:18 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-08-30 17:46 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-09-01 22:52 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-09-02 3:21 ` Andy Lutomirski
[not found] ` <CALCETrV+rv=9Rg5V1z8vHtVDW64eCNtZHQMW8DipRADvm+qP5A-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2017-09-03 2:34 ` Brijesh Singh
[not found] ` <8155b5b2-b2b3-bc8f-33ae-b81b661a2e38-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org>
2017-09-04 17:05 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-09-04 17:47 ` Brijesh Singh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8b2c75e2-6ed9-ed7d-ff62-39df8aedc12c@amd.com \
--to=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arbab@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org \
--cc=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bp@suse.de \
--cc=brijesh.singh@amd.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=labbott@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-efi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=matt@codeblueprint.co.uk \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=piotr.luc@intel.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox