From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76AAEC433F5 for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2022 17:02:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S234469AbiDHREQ (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Apr 2022 13:04:16 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:49932 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231248AbiDHREO (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Apr 2022 13:04:14 -0400 Received: from mga05.intel.com (mga05.intel.com [192.55.52.43]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C6ABB1C315F; Fri, 8 Apr 2022 10:02:10 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1649437330; x=1680973330; h=message-id:date:mime-version:to:cc:references:from: subject:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=yyWbXS/ISGdNNtqxbp6nrln8YxFisMQHA7t8fOE4CaE=; b=kGWxqI14Rdj8uUEl5Ddx57f8Eh6hNx9RN+bNmra8odOaxFnYrMqJb92h L1tobUskA9CLiXgJAml1dkMxjseAJbtxje42CCfA3OXo+U+U3YXWjq4W8 91XY3bo+fFWWfkRmYhob2fvwVNtPgRLoMyM6EbLSOXHV2WnsJ15banOUC xZqMjgTsv9WPiC38hVSwBwslNPZ+CuEWVXnOPnVh6sExrf83vIulgXj9g l1+x0MIrFK0vGxTzbzH3Z6mHGP5vpFVNb1cTNHluo4VrMmVzyLxoIv79i 1+Ra1p+axv1uz/rZhi8eO/D4OPm5lL3IDrZJfHjh1qXEK95GlSU7Bk87b w==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6400,9594,10310"; a="348076956" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.90,245,1643702400"; d="scan'208";a="348076956" Received: from orsmga006.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.51]) by fmsmga105.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 08 Apr 2022 10:02:10 -0700 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.90,245,1643702400"; d="scan'208";a="525448716" Received: from tsungtae-mobl.amr.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.134.43.198]) ([10.134.43.198]) by orsmga006-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 08 Apr 2022 10:02:09 -0700 Message-ID: <95eabe79-a13b-79b1-1196-407920531f20@intel.com> Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2022 10:02:13 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.7.0 Content-Language: en-US To: "Kirill A. Shutemov" , Borislav Petkov , Andy Lutomirski , Sean Christopherson , Andrew Morton , Joerg Roedel , Ard Biesheuvel Cc: Andi Kleen , Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan , David Rientjes , Vlastimil Babka , Tom Lendacky , Thomas Gleixner , Peter Zijlstra , Paolo Bonzini , Ingo Molnar , Varad Gautam , Dario Faggioli , Brijesh Singh , Mike Rapoport , David Hildenbrand , x86@kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-coco@lists.linux.dev, linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20220405234343.74045-1-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> From: Dave Hansen Subject: Re: [PATCHv4 0/8] mm, x86/cc: Implement support for unaccepted memory In-Reply-To: <20220405234343.74045-1-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-efi@vger.kernel.org On 4/5/22 16:43, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote: > Patches 1-6/7 are generic and don't have any dependencies on TDX. They > should serve AMD SEV needs as well. TDX-specific code isolated in the > last patch. Oh, that's quite nice. Are the SEV-SNP folks planning on using this? If they are, acks/reviews would be much appreciated.