From: "Jarkko Sakkinen" <jarkko@kernel.org>
To: "James Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>,
"Jiri Slaby" <jirislaby@kernel.org>,
"Linus Torvalds" <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: "Peter Hüwe" <PeterHuewe@gmx.de>,
"Jason Gunthorpe" <jgg@ziepe.ca>,
linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org,
"Ard Biesheuvel" <ardb@kernel.org>,
"linux-efi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-efi@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: TPM/EFI issue [Was: Linux 6.12]
Date: Sat, 14 Dec 2024 05:54:26 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <D6B4BRNN9S4U.IJ3IU91D6YRB@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <878beebf9064abb7911c015d894192077f17ef0b.camel@HansenPartnership.com>
On Tue Dec 10, 2024 at 3:04 PM EET, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Tue, 2024-12-10 at 07:13 +0100, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> [...]
> > Perhaps, you can give a hint why those happen exclusively with 6.12+?
>
> For which one: the ramdisk size not being modulo 4 or the unseal
> getting a PCR changed error? For the former I don't have much of an
> idea, it would seem to be a dracut (or whatever initrd builder you use)
> issue; the kernel doesn't care about the ramdisk size. For the latter,
> I would suspect something is delaying IMA measurements such that
> they're still going on when you're trying to unseal. The error you're
> getting occurs if any PCR changes, not just the ones the policy is
> locked to (thanks TCG). We have had syzbot reports of processes
> getting stuck in measurement that have been identified as exfat
> related:
>
> https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=1de5a37cb85a2d536330
>
> But it could be a more generic filesystem issue that measurement is
> slowing but not enough to trigger the stuck process warning.
>
> In particular systemd parallelizes a lot of stuff, so if it's doing
> something that causes IMA measurement in parallel with the unseal and
> this parallel process finished before unseal on an earlier kernel, that
> would explain it. You could probably verify this by adding more
> dependencies to the tpm target, but I'm not really well versed in
> systemd.
Yeah, I agree. This is too much looking for needle from the haystack.
A bit more evidence for kernel issue is needed than just kernel version
change in order to make progress.
> Regards,
>
> James
BR, Jarkko
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-12-14 3:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CAHk-=wgtGkHshfvaAe_O2ntnFBH3EprNk1juieLmjcF2HBwBgQ@mail.gmail.com>
2024-11-27 6:46 ` TPM/EFI issue [Was: Linux 6.12] Jiri Slaby
2024-11-27 16:24 ` James Bottomley
2024-11-28 7:20 ` Jiri Slaby
2024-11-28 16:13 ` James Bottomley
2024-11-29 6:36 ` Jiri Slaby
2024-11-29 16:03 ` James Bottomley
2024-11-29 21:08 ` James Bottomley
2024-12-02 7:56 ` Jiri Slaby
2024-11-30 7:52 ` Jiri Slaby
2024-11-30 2:49 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2024-11-30 2:52 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2024-12-02 7:52 ` Jiri Slaby
2024-12-07 12:16 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2024-12-09 6:43 ` Jiri Slaby
2024-12-09 12:54 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2024-12-10 6:13 ` Jiri Slaby
2024-12-10 13:04 ` James Bottomley
2024-12-14 3:54 ` Jarkko Sakkinen [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=D6B4BRNN9S4U.IJ3IU91D6YRB@kernel.org \
--to=jarkko@kernel.org \
--cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
--cc=PeterHuewe@gmx.de \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=jirislaby@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-efi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox