From: Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>
To: Maximilian Luz <luzmaximilian@gmail.com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Cc: Andy Gross <agross@kernel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@somainline.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
Steev Klimaszewski <steev@kali.org>,
Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-efi@vger.kernel.org,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] firmware: Add support for Qualcomm UEFI Secure Application
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2023 09:24:23 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y8ZbN5LNn2fk0/xi@hovoldconsulting.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220723224949.1089973-4-luzmaximilian@gmail.com>
On Sun, Jul 24, 2022 at 12:49:48AM +0200, Maximilian Luz wrote:
> On platforms using the Qualcomm UEFI Secure Application (uefisecapp),
> EFI variables cannot be accessed via the standard interface in EFI
> runtime mode. The respective functions return EFI_UNSUPPORTED. On these
> platforms, we instead need to talk to uefisecapp. This commit provides
> support for this and registers the respective efivars operations to
> access EFI variables from the kernel.
>
> Communication with uefisecapp follows the standard Qualcomm Trusted
> Environment (TEE or TrEE) / Secure OS conventions via the respective SCM
> call interface. This is also the reason why variable access works
> normally while boot services are active. During this time, said SCM
> interface is managed by the boot services. When calling
> ExitBootServices(), the ownership is transferred to the kernel.
> Therefore, UEFI must not use that interface itself (as multiple parties
> accessing this interface at the same time may lead to complications) and
> cannot access variables for us.
>
> Signed-off-by: Maximilian Luz <luzmaximilian@gmail.com>
> ---
> +static struct platform_driver qcom_uefisecapp_driver = {
> + .probe = qcom_uefisecapp_probe,
> + .remove = qcom_uefisecapp_remove,
> + .driver = {
> + .name = "qcom_tee_uefisecapp",
> + .of_match_table = qcom_uefisecapp_dt_match,
> + .probe_type = PROBE_PREFER_ASYNCHRONOUS,
> + },
> +};
> +module_platform_driver(qcom_uefisecapp_driver);
I noticed that for efivarfs to work, you're currently relying on having
the firmware still claim that the variable services are supported in the
RT_PROP table so that efi core registers the default ops at subsys init
time (which are later overridden by this driver).
Otherwise efivarfs may fail to initialise when built in:
static __init int efivarfs_init(void)
{
if (!efivars_kobject())
return -ENODEV;
return register_filesystem(&efivarfs_type);
}
module_init(efivarfs_init);
With recent X13s firmware the corresponding bit in the RT_PROP table has
been cleared so that efivarfs would fail to initialise. Similar problem
when booting with 'efi=noruntime'.
One way to handle this is to register also the qcom_uefisecapp_driver at
subsys init time and prevent it from being built as a module (e.g. as is
done for the SCM driver). I'm using the below patch for this currently.
I guess the Google GSMI implementation suffers from a similar problem.
Johan
From 8fecce12d215bd8cab1b8c8f9f0d1e1fe20fe6e7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@kernel.org>
Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2023 15:32:34 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] firmware: qcom_tee_uefisecapp: register at subsys init
Register efivars at subsys init time so that it is available when
efivarfs probes. For the same reason, also prevent building the driver
as a module.
This is specifically needed on platforms such as the Lenovo Thinkpad
X13s where the firmware has cleared the variable services in the RT_PROP
table so that efi core does not register any efivar callbacks at subsys
init time (which are later overridden).
Signed-off-by: Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@kernel.org>
---
drivers/firmware/Kconfig | 2 +-
drivers/firmware/qcom_tee_uefisecapp.c | 7 ++++++-
2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/firmware/Kconfig b/drivers/firmware/Kconfig
index 4e9e2c227899..48e712e363da 100644
--- a/drivers/firmware/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/firmware/Kconfig
@@ -231,7 +231,7 @@ config QCOM_TEE
select QCOM_SCM
config QCOM_TEE_UEFISECAPP
- tristate "Qualcomm TrEE UEFI Secure App client driver"
+ bool "Qualcomm TrEE UEFI Secure App client driver"
select QCOM_TEE
depends on EFI
help
diff --git a/drivers/firmware/qcom_tee_uefisecapp.c b/drivers/firmware/qcom_tee_uefisecapp.c
index 65573e4b815a..e83bce4da70a 100644
--- a/drivers/firmware/qcom_tee_uefisecapp.c
+++ b/drivers/firmware/qcom_tee_uefisecapp.c
@@ -754,7 +754,12 @@ static struct platform_driver qcom_uefisecapp_driver = {
.probe_type = PROBE_PREFER_ASYNCHRONOUS,
},
};
-module_platform_driver(qcom_uefisecapp_driver);
+
+static int __init qcom_uefisecapp_init(void)
+{
+ return platform_driver_register(&qcom_uefisecapp_driver);
+}
+subsys_initcall(qcom_uefisecapp_init);
MODULE_AUTHOR("Maximilian Luz <luzmaximilian@gmail.com>");
MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Client driver for Qualcomm TrEE/TZ UEFI Secure App");
--
2.38.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-01-17 8:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 65+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-07-23 22:49 [PATCH 0/4] firmware: Add support for Qualcomm UEFI Secure Application Maximilian Luz
2022-07-23 22:49 ` [PATCH 1/4] firmware: qcom_scm: Export SCM call functions Maximilian Luz
2022-07-23 22:49 ` [PATCH 2/4] firmware: Add support for Qualcomm Trusted Execution Environment SCM calls Maximilian Luz
2022-07-23 22:49 ` [PATCH 3/4] firmware: Add support for Qualcomm UEFI Secure Application Maximilian Luz
2023-01-17 8:24 ` Johan Hovold [this message]
2023-01-17 8:42 ` Maximilian Luz
2023-01-18 20:45 ` Maximilian Luz
2023-01-19 16:47 ` Johan Hovold
2023-01-19 17:19 ` Maximilian Luz
2023-01-17 11:05 ` Johan Hovold
2023-01-17 12:07 ` Maximilian Luz
2022-07-23 22:49 ` [PATCH 4/4] dt-bindings: firmware: Add Qualcomm UEFI Secure Application client Maximilian Luz
2022-07-25 1:06 ` Rob Herring
2022-07-26 10:17 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2022-07-26 11:15 ` Maximilian Luz
2022-07-26 13:25 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2022-07-26 15:00 ` Maximilian Luz
2022-07-27 11:24 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2022-07-27 13:00 ` Maximilian Luz
2022-07-28 7:48 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2022-07-28 10:25 ` Maximilian Luz
2022-07-28 10:38 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2022-07-28 10:49 ` Maximilian Luz
2022-07-26 14:30 ` Sudeep Holla
2022-07-26 15:15 ` Maximilian Luz
2022-07-26 15:41 ` Sudeep Holla
2022-07-26 17:01 ` Maximilian Luz
2022-07-27 11:38 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2022-07-27 13:03 ` Maximilian Luz
2022-07-27 13:24 ` Sudeep Holla
2022-07-27 14:49 ` Maximilian Luz
2022-07-28 6:03 ` Ilias Apalodimas
2022-07-28 10:48 ` Maximilian Luz
2022-07-28 11:33 ` Sudeep Holla
2022-07-28 12:13 ` Maximilian Luz
2022-07-28 12:24 ` Ilias Apalodimas
2022-07-28 15:05 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2022-07-28 15:16 ` Ilias Apalodimas
2022-07-28 16:16 ` Sudeep Holla
2022-07-28 16:24 ` Konrad Dybcio
2022-07-28 12:35 ` Ilias Apalodimas
2022-07-28 12:49 ` Maximilian Luz
2022-07-28 16:56 ` Ilias Apalodimas
2022-07-28 17:27 ` Maximilian Luz
2022-07-29 8:52 ` Sudeep Holla
2022-07-29 15:11 ` Maximilian Luz
2022-07-31 9:54 ` Ilias Apalodimas
2022-07-31 22:48 ` Maximilian Luz
2022-07-28 8:23 ` Sudeep Holla
2022-07-28 10:05 ` Maximilian Luz
2022-07-28 11:21 ` Sudeep Holla
2022-07-28 11:45 ` Maximilian Luz
2022-07-28 13:42 ` Sudeep Holla
2022-07-28 14:09 ` Maximilian Luz
2022-07-25 19:27 ` [PATCH 0/4] firmware: Add support for Qualcomm UEFI Secure Application Rob Herring
2022-07-25 20:16 ` Maximilian Luz
2022-08-02 11:51 ` Srinivas Kandagatla
2022-08-02 13:22 ` Maximilian Luz
2022-08-02 14:02 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2022-08-02 19:11 ` Maximilian Luz
2022-09-02 7:26 ` Sumit Garg
2022-09-02 13:18 ` Maximilian Luz
2022-09-05 6:50 ` Sumit Garg
2022-11-23 11:22 ` Srinivas Kandagatla
2022-11-23 12:05 ` Maximilian Luz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Y8ZbN5LNn2fk0/xi@hovoldconsulting.com \
--to=johan@kernel.org \
--cc=agross@kernel.org \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
--cc=cristian.marussi@arm.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=konrad.dybcio@somainline.org \
--cc=krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-efi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luzmaximilian@gmail.com \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=shawn.guo@linaro.org \
--cc=steev@kali.org \
--cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox