From: Demi Marie Obenour <demi@invisiblethingslab.com>
To: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
linux-efi@vger.kernel.org,
Xen developer discussion <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, "Peter Jones" <pjones@redhat.com>,
"Juergen Gross" <jgross@suse.com>,
"Stefano Stabellini" <sstabellini@kernel.org>,
"Oleksandr Tyshchenko" <oleksandr_tyshchenko@epam.com>,
"Kees Cook" <keescook@chromium.org>,
"Anton Vorontsov" <anton@enomsg.org>,
"Colin Cross" <ccross@android.com>,
"Tony Luck" <tony.luck@intel.com>,
"Marek Marczykowski-Górecki" <marmarek@invisiblethingslab.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/6] efi: xen: Implement memory descriptor lookup based on hypercall
Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2022 11:29:22 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Yzr/1s9CbA0CClmt@itl-email> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221003112625.972646-6-ardb@kernel.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3616 bytes --]
On Mon, Oct 03, 2022 at 01:26:24PM +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> Xen on x86 boots dom0 in EFI mode but without providing a memory map.
> This means that some sanity checks we would like to perform on
> configuration tables or other data structures in memory are not
> currently possible. Xen does, however, expose EFI memory descriptor info
> via a Xen hypercall, so let's wire that up instead.
>
> Co-developed-by: Demi Marie Obenour <demi@invisiblethingslab.com>
> Signed-off-by: Demi Marie Obenour <demi@invisiblethingslab.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
> ---
> drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c | 5 ++-
> drivers/xen/efi.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++
> include/linux/efi.h | 1 +
> 3 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c b/drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c
> index 55bd3f4aab28..2c12b1a06481 100644
> --- a/drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c
> +++ b/drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c
> @@ -456,7 +456,7 @@ void __init efi_find_mirror(void)
> * and if so, populate the supplied memory descriptor with the appropriate
> * data.
> */
> -int efi_mem_desc_lookup(u64 phys_addr, efi_memory_desc_t *out_md)
> +int __efi_mem_desc_lookup(u64 phys_addr, efi_memory_desc_t *out_md)
> {
> efi_memory_desc_t *md;
>
> @@ -485,6 +485,9 @@ int efi_mem_desc_lookup(u64 phys_addr, efi_memory_desc_t *out_md)
> return -ENOENT;
> }
>
> +extern int efi_mem_desc_lookup(u64 phys_addr, efi_memory_desc_t *out_md)
> + __weak __alias(__efi_mem_desc_lookup);
> +
> /*
> * Calculate the highest address of an efi memory descriptor.
> */
> diff --git a/drivers/xen/efi.c b/drivers/xen/efi.c
> index d1ff2186ebb4..74f3f6d8cdc8 100644
> --- a/drivers/xen/efi.c
> +++ b/drivers/xen/efi.c
> @@ -26,6 +26,7 @@
>
> #include <xen/interface/xen.h>
> #include <xen/interface/platform.h>
> +#include <xen/page.h>
> #include <xen/xen.h>
> #include <xen/xen-ops.h>
>
> @@ -292,3 +293,36 @@ void __init xen_efi_runtime_setup(void)
> efi.get_next_high_mono_count = xen_efi_get_next_high_mono_count;
> efi.reset_system = xen_efi_reset_system;
> }
> +
> +int efi_mem_desc_lookup(u64 phys_addr, efi_memory_desc_t *out_md)
> +{
> + static_assert(XEN_PAGE_SHIFT == EFI_PAGE_SHIFT,
> + "Mismatch between EFI_PAGE_SHIFT and XEN_PAGE_SHIFT");
> + struct xen_platform_op op = {
> + .cmd = XENPF_firmware_info,
> + .u.firmware_info = {
> + .type = XEN_FW_EFI_INFO,
> + .index = XEN_FW_EFI_MEM_INFO,
> + .u.efi_info.mem.addr = phys_addr,
> + .u.efi_info.mem.size = U64_MAX - phys_addr,
> + }
> + };
> + union xenpf_efi_info *info = &op.u.firmware_info.u.efi_info;
> + int rc;
> +
> + if (!efi_enabled(EFI_PARAVIRT) || efi_enabled(EFI_MEMMAP))
> + return __efi_mem_desc_lookup(phys_addr, out_md);
> +
> + rc = HYPERVISOR_platform_op(&op);
> + if (rc) {
> + pr_warn("Failed to lookup header 0x%llx in Xen memory map: error %d\n",
> + phys_addr, rc);
> + }
> +
> + out_md->phys_addr = info->mem.addr;
This will be equal to phys_addr, not the actual start of the memory
region.
> + out_md->num_pages = info->mem.size >> EFI_PAGE_SHIFT;
Similarly, this will be the number of bytes in the memory region
after phys_addr, not the total number of bytes in the region. These two
differences mean that this function is not strictly equivalent to the
original efi_mem_desc_lookup().
I am not sure if this matters in practice, but I thought you would want
to be aware of it.
--
Sincerely,
Demi Marie Obenour (she/her/hers)
Invisible Things Lab
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-10-03 15:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-10-03 11:26 [PATCH v2 0/6] efi/x86: Avoid corrupted config tables under Xen Ard Biesheuvel
2022-10-03 11:26 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] efi: Move EFI fake memmap support into x86 arch tree Ard Biesheuvel
2022-10-03 11:26 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] efi: memmap: Move manipulation routines " Ard Biesheuvel
2022-10-03 11:26 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] efi: xen: Set EFI_PARAVIRT for Xen dom0 boot on all architectures Ard Biesheuvel
2022-10-03 11:26 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] efi: memmap: Disregard bogus entries instead of returning them Ard Biesheuvel
2022-10-03 15:18 ` Demi Marie Obenour
2022-10-03 15:57 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2022-10-03 11:26 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] efi: xen: Implement memory descriptor lookup based on hypercall Ard Biesheuvel
2022-10-03 15:29 ` Demi Marie Obenour [this message]
2022-10-03 15:59 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2022-10-03 16:04 ` Marek Marczykowski-Górecki
2022-10-03 16:22 ` Demi Marie Obenour
2022-10-03 16:37 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2022-10-03 17:04 ` Marek Marczykowski-Górecki
2022-10-03 17:57 ` Demi Marie Obenour
2022-10-03 18:01 ` Marek Marczykowski-Górecki
2023-01-15 13:31 ` Marek Marczykowski-Górecki
2022-11-19 1:10 ` Demi Marie Obenour
2022-10-03 11:26 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] efi: Apply allowlist to EFI configuration tables when running under Xen Ard Biesheuvel
2022-12-06 23:19 ` Demi Marie Obenour
2023-01-19 19:03 ` [PATCH v3 0/5] efi: Support ESRT " Demi Marie Obenour
2023-01-19 19:03 ` [PATCH v3 1/5] efi: memmap: Disregard bogus entries instead of returning them Demi Marie Obenour
2023-01-19 19:03 ` [PATCH v3 2/5] efi: xen: Implement memory descriptor lookup based on hypercall Demi Marie Obenour
2023-01-19 19:03 ` [PATCH v3 3/5] efi: Apply allowlist to EFI configuration tables when running under Xen Demi Marie Obenour
2023-01-19 19:03 ` [PATCH v3 4/5] efi: Actually enable the ESRT " Demi Marie Obenour
2023-01-19 19:04 ` [PATCH v3 5/5] efi: Warn if trying to reserve memory " Demi Marie Obenour
2023-01-23 7:30 ` [PATCH v3 0/5] efi: Support ESRT " Ard Biesheuvel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Yzr/1s9CbA0CClmt@itl-email \
--to=demi@invisiblethingslab.com \
--cc=anton@enomsg.org \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=ccross@android.com \
--cc=jgross@suse.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-efi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marmarek@invisiblethingslab.com \
--cc=oleksandr_tyshchenko@epam.com \
--cc=pjones@redhat.com \
--cc=sstabellini@kernel.org \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox