From: "Jasmeet (Jazz) Bhatia" <jasmeet.bhatia.us@gmail.com>
To: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Cc: Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org>,
rafael@kernel.org, Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>,
linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Jasmeet (Jazz) Bhatia" <jasmeet.bhatia.us@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH v1 0/2] efi/tpm: Preserve event log without changing x86 E820
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2026 04:34:06 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <cover.1788259938.git.jasmeet.bhatia.us@gmail.com> (raw)
The EFI stub currently allocates the TPM event log as
EFI_ACPI_RECLAIM_MEMORY. On x86, this becomes an ACPI data entry
in the E820 map.
On a Framework Laptop 16 (AMD Ryzen AI 300 Series), the EFI allocator
can place this allocation at different physical addresses across boots.
Since x86 hibernation validates architecture-specific data from
the firmware E820 map, this causes an otherwise valid hibernation image
to be rejected on resume with the following error:
Hibernate inconsistent memory map detected!
PM: hibernation: Image mismatch: architecture specific data
Allocating the event log as EFI_LOADER_DATA avoids changing the E820
map, but doing that alone would regress the kexec corruption issue fixed
by commit 77d48d39e991 ("efistub/tpm: Use ACPI reclaim memory for event
log to avoid corruption").
This patch series instead installs the Linux EFI memreserve table on the
x86 stub path and then uses efi_mem_reserve_persistent() to preserve the
TPM event log across kexec while keeping the allocation as
EFI_LOADER_DATA.
The series was also backported to Linux 7.2 for validation on the
affected system.
Results:
- stock 7.2:
TPM event log allocation changes the E820 map across boots;
hibernation resume fails
- EFI_LOADER_DATA-only diagnostic build:
E820 map remains stable;
hibernation resume succeeds
- this series:
TPM range is persistently reserved;
hibernation resume succeeds with the normal device drivers;
kexec_file_load() succeeds with the TPM range preserved;
kexec_load() succeeds with the TPM range preserved
For kexec_file_load(), the event log had the same size and SHA256 digest
before and after kexec. For kexec_load(), the before and after event log
files compared byte-for-byte identical.
The original report and investigation are here:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/DL3MNWW4VEBR.K3K6A92WMHUY@gmail.com/
Patch 1 makes the existing EFI memreserve table installer available to
the x86 EFI stub path.
Patch 2 switches the TPM event log allocation back to EFI_LOADER_DATA
and persistently reserves it after the normal TPM event log reservation
has succeeded.
Jasmeet (Jazz) Bhatia (2):
efi/libstub: Install memreserve table on x86
efi/tpm: Persistently reserve the TPM event log
.../firmware/efi/libstub/efi-stub-helper.c | 23 ++++++++++++++++
drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/efi-stub.c | 23 ----------------
drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/efistub.h | 1 +
drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/tpm.c | 2 +-
drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/x86-stub.c | 2 ++
drivers/firmware/efi/tpm.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++
6 files changed, 54 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
base-commit: 786262be6048deab760f68c8acc2c85607165894
--
2.55.0
next reply other threads:[~2026-09-01 11:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-01 11:34 Jasmeet (Jazz) Bhatia [this message]
2026-09-01 11:34 ` [PATCH v1 1/2] efi/libstub: Install memreserve table on x86 Jasmeet (Jazz) Bhatia
2026-09-01 11:34 ` [PATCH v1 2/2] efi/tpm: Persistently reserve the TPM event log Jasmeet (Jazz) Bhatia
2026-09-03 14:18 ` [PATCH v1 0/2] efi/tpm: Preserve event log without changing x86 E820 Ard Biesheuvel
2026-09-04 15:45 ` Jasmeet (Jazz) Bhatia
2026-09-04 16:38 ` Ard Biesheuvel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=cover.1788259938.git.jasmeet.bhatia.us@gmail.com \
--to=jasmeet.bhatia.us@gmail.com \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-efi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox