From: Linn Crosetto <linn-VXdhtT5mjnY@public.gmane.org>
To: linux-efi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] efi: Request desired alignment via the PE/COFF headers
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2015 21:43:54 +0000 (UTC) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <loom.20150615T232724-11@post.gmane.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 1405007963-520-1-git-send-email-mbrown@fensystems.co.uk
Michael Brown <mbrown@...> writes:
>
> The kernel will align itself to the nearest boundary specified by the
> kernel_alignment field in the bzImage header. If the kernel is loaded
> to an address which is not sufficiently aligned, it will therefore use
> memory beyond that indicated solely by the init_size field.
>
> The PE/COFF headers now include a .bss section to describe the
> requirements of the init_size field, but do not currently expose the
> alignment requirement. Consequently, a kernel loaded via the PE entry
> point may still end up overwriting unexpected areas of memory.
>
> Fix by exposing the desired alignment via the SectionAlignment field
> in the PE/COFF headers. Despite its name, this field provides an
> overall alignment requirement for the loaded file. (Naturally, the
> FileAlignment field describes the alignment for individual sections.)
>
> There is no way in the PE/COFF headers to express the concept of
> min_alignment; we therefore do not expose the minimum (as opposed to
> preferred) alignment.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michael Brown <mbrown@...>
> ---
> arch/x86/boot/header.S | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/boot/header.S b/arch/x86/boot/header.S
> index 7a6d43a..16ef025 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/boot/header.S
> +++ b/arch/x86/boot/header.S
> <at> <at> -154,7 +154,7 <at> <at> extra_header_fields:
> #else
> .quad 0 # ImageBase
> #endif
> - .long 0x20 # SectionAlignment
> + .long CONFIG_PHYSICAL_ALIGN # SectionAlignment
> .long 0x20 # FileAlignment
> .word 0 #
MajorOperatingSystemVersion
> .word 0 #
MinorOperatingSystemVersion
There may be a problem with this change. The specification says that the
SizeOfImage field must be a multiple of SectionAlignment. That was the case
when SectionAlignment was 0x20, but now that it is so large it would
require quite an increase in the last section to comply. A kernel I am
looking at now has:
Alignment of sections: 0x1000000
Size of image: 0x105a000
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-06-15 21:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-07-10 15:59 [PATCH v3] efi: Request desired alignment via the PE/COFF headers Michael Brown
[not found] ` <1405007963-520-1-git-send-email-mbrown-OViyBiuKJBuK421+ScFKDQ@public.gmane.org>
2014-07-10 20:36 ` Matt Fleming
[not found] ` <20140710203633.GC5952-HNK1S37rvNbeXh+fF434Mdi2O/JbrIOy@public.gmane.org>
2014-07-11 0:18 ` Michael Brown
[not found] ` <53BF2D63.60808-OViyBiuKJBuK421+ScFKDQ@public.gmane.org>
2014-07-11 7:41 ` Matt Fleming
[not found] ` <20140711074117.GE5952-HNK1S37rvNbeXh+fF434Mdi2O/JbrIOy@public.gmane.org>
2014-07-11 15:16 ` Michael Brown
[not found] ` <53BFFFCE.5040002-OViyBiuKJBuK421+ScFKDQ@public.gmane.org>
2014-07-14 13:10 ` Matt Fleming
[not found] ` <20140714131042.GJ5952-HNK1S37rvNbeXh+fF434Mdi2O/JbrIOy@public.gmane.org>
2014-07-14 13:28 ` Michael Brown
2015-06-15 21:43 ` Linn Crosetto [this message]
[not found] ` <loom.20150615T232724-11-eS7Uydv5nfjZ+VzJOa5vwg@public.gmane.org>
2015-06-16 16:19 ` Michael Brown
[not found] ` <55804C91.4030000-OViyBiuKJBuK421+ScFKDQ@public.gmane.org>
2015-06-16 17:37 ` Linn Crosetto
[not found] ` <20150616173725.GE13153-QpTgeCMhooRo/CpIj0byZw@public.gmane.org>
2015-06-18 22:02 ` Matt Fleming
[not found] ` <20150618220241.GA2776-mF/unelCI9GS6iBeEJttW/XRex20P6io@public.gmane.org>
2015-06-18 22:27 ` Michael Brown
[not found] ` <558345EB.8010408-OViyBiuKJBuK421+ScFKDQ@public.gmane.org>
2015-06-19 12:21 ` Matt Fleming
[not found] ` <20150619122147.GC2776-mF/unelCI9GS6iBeEJttW/XRex20P6io@public.gmane.org>
2015-06-19 12:25 ` Michael Brown
[not found] ` <55840A3B.3000400-OViyBiuKJBuK421+ScFKDQ@public.gmane.org>
2015-07-15 14:11 ` Matt Fleming
[not found] ` <20150715141119.GA6955-mF/unelCI9GS6iBeEJttW/XRex20P6io@public.gmane.org>
2015-07-15 16:56 ` Linn Crosetto
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=loom.20150615T232724-11@post.gmane.org \
--to=linn-vxdhtt5mjny@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-efi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).