From: Pratyush Yadav <pratyush@kernel.org>
To: Evangelos Petrongonas <epetron@amazon.de>
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
Alexander Graf <graf@amazon.com>,
Changyuan Lyu <changyuanl@google.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>, <kexec@lists.infradead.org>,
<linux-mm@kvack.org>, <linux-efi@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <nh-open-source@amazon.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] kexec: introduce is_kho_boot()
Date: Tue, 09 Sep 2025 14:13:58 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <mafs0wm67lt6h.fsf@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7dc6674a76bf6e68cca0222ccff32427699cc02e.1755721529.git.epetron@amazon.de>
On Thu, Aug 21 2025, Evangelos Petrongonas wrote:
> During early initialisation, after a kexec, other components, like EFI
> need to know if a KHO enabled kexec is performed. The `kho_is_enabled`
> function is not enough as in the early stages, it only reflects
> whether the cmdline has KHO enabled, not if an actual KHO FDT exists.
>
> Extend the KHO API with `is_kho_boot()` to provide a way for components
> to check if a KHO enabled kexec is performed.
Neat! I have always found doing if (kho_get_fdt()) a bit awkward.
Reviewed-by: Pratyush Yadav <pratyush@kernel.org>
[...]
--
Regards,
Pratyush Yadav
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-09 12:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-08-21 17:58 [PATCH v3 0/2] efi: Fix EFI boot with kexec handover (KHO) Evangelos Petrongonas
2025-08-21 17:58 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] kexec: introduce is_kho_boot() Evangelos Petrongonas
2025-09-09 12:13 ` Pratyush Yadav [this message]
2025-08-21 17:59 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] efi: Support booting with kexec handover (KHO) Evangelos Petrongonas
2025-08-23 21:47 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2025-09-04 7:19 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2025-09-04 9:34 ` Evangelos Petrongonas
2025-09-04 9:39 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2025-09-04 12:57 ` Evangelos Petrongonas
2025-09-08 5:50 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2025-09-09 12:17 ` Pratyush Yadav
2025-08-21 20:58 ` [PATCH v3 0/2] efi: Fix EFI boot " Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=mafs0wm67lt6h.fsf@kernel.org \
--to=pratyush@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=bhe@redhat.com \
--cc=changyuanl@google.com \
--cc=epetron@amazon.de \
--cc=graf@amazon.com \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-efi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=nh-open-source@amazon.com \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).