From: tip-bot for Hedi Berriche <tipbot@zytor.com>
To: linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org,
rja@hpe.com, mike.travis@hpe.com, bhsharma@redhat.com,
mingo@redhat.com, mingo@kernel.org, bp@suse.de, x86@kernel.org,
sivanich@hpe.com, hpa@zytor.com, tglx@linutronix.de,
steve.wahl@hpe.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
andy@infradead.org, hedi.berriche@hpe.com, dvhart@infradead.org
Subject: [tip:x86/uv] x86/platform/UV: Use efi_enabled() instead of test_bit()
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2019 07:05:32 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <tip-8945d96f7b3ead56e053ac79b8f7b0de98a30bfe@git.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190213193413.25560-4-hedi.berriche@hpe.com>
Commit-ID: 8945d96f7b3ead56e053ac79b8f7b0de98a30bfe
Gitweb: https://git.kernel.org/tip/8945d96f7b3ead56e053ac79b8f7b0de98a30bfe
Author: Hedi Berriche <hedi.berriche@hpe.com>
AuthorDate: Wed, 13 Feb 2019 19:34:12 +0000
Committer: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
CommitDate: Fri, 15 Feb 2019 15:15:18 +0100
x86/platform/UV: Use efi_enabled() instead of test_bit()
Use ad hoc efi_enabled() instead of fiddling with test_bit().
Cleanup, no functional changes.
Signed-off-by: Hedi Berriche <hedi.berriche@hpe.com>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Russ Anderson <rja@hpe.com>
Reviewed-by: Dimitri Sivanich <sivanich@hpe.com>
Reviewed-by: Mike Travis <mike.travis@hpe.com>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andy@infradead.org>
Cc: Bhupesh Sharma <bhsharma@redhat.com>
Cc: Darren Hart <dvhart@infradead.org>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-efi <linux-efi@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Steve Wahl <steve.wahl@hpe.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: x86-ml <x86@kernel.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190213193413.25560-4-hedi.berriche@hpe.com
---
arch/x86/platform/uv/bios_uv.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/platform/uv/bios_uv.c b/arch/x86/platform/uv/bios_uv.c
index 91e3d5285836..38a2e3431fc6 100644
--- a/arch/x86/platform/uv/bios_uv.c
+++ b/arch/x86/platform/uv/bios_uv.c
@@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ s64 uv_bios_call(enum uv_bios_cmd which, u64 a1, u64 a2, u64 a3, u64 a4, u64 a5)
* If EFI_OLD_MEMMAP is set, we need to fall back to using our old EFI
* callback method, which uses efi_call() directly, with the kernel page tables:
*/
- if (unlikely(test_bit(EFI_OLD_MEMMAP, &efi.flags)))
+ if (unlikely(efi_enabled(EFI_OLD_MEMMAP)))
ret = efi_call((void *)__va(tab->function), (u64)which, a1, a2, a3, a4, a5);
else
ret = efi_call_virt_pointer(tab, function, (u64)which, a1, a2, a3, a4, a5);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-02-15 15:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-02-13 19:34 [Patch v3 0/4] Protect against concurrent calls into UV BIOS Hedi Berriche
2019-02-13 19:34 ` [Patch v3 1/4] x86/platform/UV: remove unnecessary #ifdef CONFIG_EFI Hedi Berriche
2019-02-15 15:04 ` [tip:x86/uv] x86/platform/UV: Remove " tip-bot for Hedi Berriche
2019-02-13 19:34 ` [Patch v3 2/4] x86/platform/UV: kill uv_bios_call_reentrant() Hedi Berriche
2019-02-15 15:04 ` [tip:x86/uv] x86/platform/UV: Remove uv_bios_call_reentrant() tip-bot for Hedi Berriche
2019-02-13 19:34 ` [Patch v3 3/4] x86/platform/UV: use efi_enabled() instead of test_bit() Hedi Berriche
2019-02-15 15:05 ` tip-bot for Hedi Berriche [this message]
2019-02-13 19:34 ` [Patch v3 4/4] x86/platform/UV: use efi_runtime_lock to serialise BIOS calls Hedi Berriche
2019-02-15 15:01 ` [tip:x86/urgent] x86/platform/UV: Use " tip-bot for Hedi Berriche
2019-02-14 8:17 ` [Patch v3 0/4] Protect against concurrent calls into UV BIOS Ard Biesheuvel
2019-02-14 21:08 ` Russ Anderson
2019-02-14 21:21 ` Dimitri Sivanich
2019-02-14 21:31 ` Mike Travis
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=tip-8945d96f7b3ead56e053ac79b8f7b0de98a30bfe@git.kernel.org \
--to=tipbot@zytor.com \
--cc=andy@infradead.org \
--cc=ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org \
--cc=bhsharma@redhat.com \
--cc=bp@suse.de \
--cc=dvhart@infradead.org \
--cc=hedi.berriche@hpe.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-efi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mike.travis@hpe.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=rja@hpe.com \
--cc=sivanich@hpe.com \
--cc=steve.wahl@hpe.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox