From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Woodhouse Subject: Re: cross-compiling alternatives (was Re: [PATCH 0/1] Embedded Maintainer(s)...) Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 12:09:53 +0100 Message-ID: <1213614593.26255.691.camel@pmac.infradead.org> References: <1209577322.25560.402.camel@pmac.infradead.org> <200806131106.18487.neundorf@eit.uni-kl.de> <1213348320.26255.231.camel@pmac.infradead.org> <200806131132.55543.neundorf@eit.uni-kl.de> <20080613152854.GM11760@nibiru.local> <20080614003102.GB30652@shareable.org> <20080616042310.GH12962@nibiru.local> <20080616104917.GA18857@shareable.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20080616104917.GA18857@shareable.org> Sender: linux-embedded-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: Jamie Lokier Cc: Enrico Weigelt , linux-embedded@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2008-06-16 at 11:49 +0100, Jamie Lokier wrote: > But here's the thing: do you really want every package have code > calling every different variation on a system call, at run time, until > it finds one that works? No. That functionality lives in libc, if you want it at all. -- dwmw2