From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <Geert.Uytterhoeven@sonycom.com>,
Gilad Ben-Yossef <gilad@codefidence.com>,
Tim Bird <tim.bird@am.sony.com>,
linux-embedded <linux-embedded@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Recommendation for activating a deferred module init in the kernel
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 11:41:57 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1213785717.26255.1192.camel@pmac.infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080618103302.GA16139@cs181133002.pp.htv.fi>
On Wed, 2008-06-18 at 13:33 +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> But even after all optimizations CONFIG_MODULES=y will still cause a
> significant additional cost [1] when thinking in the dimensions of
> Tim's "the 30 or so Linux-tiny patches that I use get me about 110k of
> reductions. For me, this is about 5% of my kernel size" statement in
> another thread.
Yes. If the system in question is currently being built without
CONFIG_MODULES, that's fairly much a no-go for my alternative
suggestion.
--
dwmw2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-06-18 10:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-06-18 6:47 Recommendation for activating a deferred module init in the kernel Gilad Ben-Yossef
2008-06-18 8:20 ` David Woodhouse
2008-06-18 8:32 ` David Woodhouse
2008-06-18 8:52 ` Adrian Bunk
2008-06-18 8:57 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2008-06-18 9:59 ` David Woodhouse
2008-06-18 10:33 ` Adrian Bunk
2008-06-18 10:41 ` David Woodhouse [this message]
2008-06-18 11:37 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2008-06-18 14:56 ` Nicolas Pitre
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-06-17 18:23 Tim Bird
2008-06-17 18:51 ` David VomLehn
2008-06-17 19:07 ` Jörn Engel
2008-06-17 19:22 ` Jim Freeman
2008-06-17 20:06 ` Tim Bird
2008-06-17 19:52 ` Tim Bird
2008-06-17 19:55 ` Tim Bird
2008-06-17 20:23 ` Jörn Engel
2008-06-17 20:35 ` Josh Boyer
2008-06-17 22:48 ` Stefan Richter
2008-06-18 0:03 ` Johannes Stezenbach
2008-06-18 0:10 ` Stefan Richter
2008-06-18 9:38 ` Johannes Stezenbach
2008-06-17 20:19 ` Jörn Engel
2008-06-18 12:38 ` Amol Lad
[not found] ` <4858A659.8030502@codefidence.com>
2008-06-18 16:08 ` Tim Bird
[not found] ` <4859ECF3.3000500@codefidence.com>
2008-06-19 17:58 ` Tim Bird
2008-06-22 7:08 ` Gilad Ben-Yossef
2008-06-23 17:40 ` Tim Bird
2008-07-01 14:20 ` Gilad Ben-Yossef
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1213785717.26255.1192.camel@pmac.infradead.org \
--to=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=Geert.Uytterhoeven@sonycom.com \
--cc=bunk@kernel.org \
--cc=gilad@codefidence.com \
--cc=linux-embedded@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tim.bird@am.sony.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).