From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Woodhouse Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/14] Pramfs: Include files Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 23:20:39 +0100 Message-ID: <1245709239.25547.394.camel@macbook.infradead.org> References: <4A33A7EC.6070008@gmail.com> <200906221317.04166.arnd@arndb.de> <4A3FC7F1.5050108@gmail.com> <200906222033.20883.arnd@arndb.de> <4A3FDBFE.8050509@2net.co.uk> <20090622214155.GA19332@logfs.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20090622214155.GA19332@logfs.org> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?J=F6rn?= Engel Cc: Chris Simmonds , Arnd Bergmann , Marco , Sam Ravnborg , Linux FS Devel , Linux Embedded , Linux Kernel On Mon, 2009-06-22 at 23:41 +0200, J=C3=B6rn Engel wrote: > Four loops doing the same increment with different data types: long, > u64, we32 (wrong-endian) and we64. Compile with _no_ optimizations. That's a bit of a poor test then. Especially on architectures with a load-and-swap instruction where it really shouldn't be any slower at all. (Although since GCC doesn't have an __attribute__((littleendian)) I'm not entirely sure how to entice it into _using_ said instruction for th= e purpose of the test... I think the kernel does manage somehow though, i= f you get the sources _just_ right.) --=20 David Woodhouse Open Source Technology Centr= e David.Woodhouse@intel.com Intel Corporatio= n -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel= " in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html