From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matt Mackall Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/11] readahead: bump up the default readahead size Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2010 15:37:34 -0600 Message-ID: <1265924254.15603.79.camel@calx> References: <20100207041013.891441102@intel.com> <20100207041043.147345346@intel.com> <4B6FBB3F.4010701@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20100208134634.GA3024@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20100208134634.GA3024@localhost> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: Wu Fengguang Cc: Christian Ehrhardt , Andrew Morton , Jens Axboe , Chris Mason , Peter Zijlstra , Martin Schwidefsky , Clemens Ladisch , Olivier Galibert , Linux Memory Management List , "linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" , LKML , Paul Gortmaker , David Woodhouse , linux-embedded@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2010-02-08 at 21:46 +0800, Wu Fengguang wrote: > Chris, > > Firstly inform the linux-embedded maintainers :) > > I think it's a good suggestion to add a config option > (CONFIG_READAHEAD_SIZE). Will update the patch.. I don't have a strong opinion here beyond the nagging feeling that we should be using a per-bdev scaling window scheme rather than something static. -- http://selenic.com : development and support for Mercurial and Linux -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org