From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Joe Perches Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] printk: add pr__once, guard print_hex_dump Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2010 10:51:36 -0800 Message-ID: <1291661496.17494.221.camel@Joe-Laptop> References: <1291649869.3065.2095.camel@calx> <1291659120.17494.179.camel@Joe-Laptop> <1291659380.3065.2214.camel@calx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1291659380.3065.2214.camel@calx> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: Matt Mackall Cc: Andrew Morton , Paul Gortmaker , David Woodhouse , linux-embedded@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2010-12-06 at 12:16 -0600, Matt Mackall wrote: > On Mon, 2010-12-06 at 10:12 -0800, Joe Perches wrote: > > There could be ~500 bytes more saved if hex_dump_to_buffer > > was compiled out. > Can't say I'm excited by this approach. .5k is under my threshold for > this level of invasiveness. Mine too, but I thought I'd mention it.