From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org>
Subject: Re: Representing Embedded Architectures at the Kernel Summit
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 18:13:32 -0500
Message-ID: <1B5FD82F-79A5-4FD1-BA99-59F3041B0470@kernel.crashing.org>
References: <1243956140.4229.25.camel@mulgrave.int.hansenpartnership.com> <20090602172941.GL3095@hansolo.jdub.homelinux.org> <20090602222132.GK6399@game.jcrosoft.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v935.3)
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <20090602222132.GK6399@game.jcrosoft.org>
Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-embedded.vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"; delsp="yes"
To: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>
Cc: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@linux.vnet.ibm.com>, James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>, ksummit-2009-discuss@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-embedded@vger.kernel.org


On Jun 2, 2009, at 5:21 PM, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:

> I'd like to propose AMP and kernel relocate
> as more and SoC will came with multiple core with or without the  
> same arch

I think AMP or at least the idea of the kernel communicating with  
other OSes on the same SoC in multi-core systems is interesting.

- k