From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jamie Lokier Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/1] Embedded Maintainer(s), linux-embedded@vger list Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2008 15:29:11 +0100 Message-ID: <20080610142911.GA32696@shareable.org> References: <87a5b0800806100647r178e54c0qd34cbf26f6ce24d@mail.gmail.com> <20080610140139.9817F2430C@gemini.denx.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080610140139.9817F2430C@gemini.denx.de> Sender: linux-embedded-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Wolfgang Denk Cc: Will Newton , David Woodhouse , Sam Ravnborg , Rob Landley , Leon Woestenberg , linux-embedded@vger.kernel.org Wolfgang Denk wrote: > In message <87a5b0800806100647r178e54c0qd34cbf26f6ce24d@mail.gmail.com> you wrote: > > > > I would be surprised if it was possible to compile Linux with gcc 4.2 > > with 32MiB of total system memory. > > Hint: if memory really gets tight, you can use swap space. Either to > a local drive (either through PCI or PCMCIA/PCCard or USB or FW or > ...), or over the network. This just adds another level of stress > testing to areas in the kernel that are not so well covered by some > other tests. Great, I'm looking forward to your implementation of swap on no-MMU! Thanks, -- Jamie