From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Enrico Weigelt Subject: Re: cross-compiling alternatives Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 16:51:58 +0200 Message-ID: <20080613145158.GG11760@nibiru.local> References: <1209577322.25560.402.camel@pmac.infradead.org> <1213351433.17853.61.camel@tara.firmix.at> <20080613131753.GA19549@shareable.org> <200806131540.15558.neundorf@eit.uni-kl.de> <48527C96.4070404@parrot.com> <20080613144118.GE11760@nibiru.local> <20080613144920.GB21071@shareable.org> Reply-To: weigelt@metux.de Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080613144920.GB21071@shareable.org> Sender: linux-embedded-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Linux Embedded Maillist * Jamie Lokier schrieb: > Enrico Weigelt wrote: > > But: the question is whether you'll need such a test at all > > or if just using sizeof() at the right place won't do the trick ;-P > > It's best to do that if you can, and nearly always possible. There > are a few coding techniques - especially performance sensitive - where > that's not feasible. Example ? cu -- --------------------------------------------------------------------- Enrico Weigelt == metux IT service - http://www.metux.de/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please visit the OpenSource QM Taskforce: http://wiki.metux.de/public/OpenSource_QM_Taskforce Patches / Fixes for a lot dozens of packages in dozens of versions: http://patches.metux.de/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------