From: David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>
To: Mike Frysinger <vapier.adi@gmail.com>
Cc: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>,
Paulius Zaleckas <paulius.zaleckas@teltonika.lt>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk,
linux-embedded@vger.kernel.org,
Laurent Pinchart <laurentp@cse-semaphore.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] phylib: make mdio-gpio work without OF (v2)
Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 21:45:40 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200811042045.41052.david-b@pacbell.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8bd0f97a0811041609l3bd474afh7e526be368d4c5cf@mail.gmail.com>
On Tuesday 04 November 2008, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > That's generally the preferred way to handle #ifdeffery.
> > But I could imagine OF isn't (yet?) set up to handle it.
>
> i agree completely with the inclination to do it all in C as you've
> suggested and let the compiler do dead code elimination, but that only
> works if the functions in question are defined everywhere (in other
> words, there's a linux/ api for it). i dont think that's the case for
> OF (which is what you were implying?) ...
Only works if the functions are "declared" everywhere;
the stuff that's included in header files.
A "definition" would be available at link time (except
for inlined functions, in headers). Actual C functions.
If indeed OF functions don't have declarations which are
available on all platforms, that might be worth fixing
to enable this approach to #ifdef elimination.
- Dave
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-11-05 4:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-11-04 14:45 [PATCH] phylib: make mdio-gpio work without OF (v2) Paulius Zaleckas
2008-11-04 15:45 ` Marc Pignat
2008-11-04 15:57 ` Grant Likely
2008-11-04 16:24 ` Grant Likely
2008-11-05 0:04 ` David Brownell
2008-11-05 0:09 ` Mike Frysinger
2008-11-05 4:45 ` David Brownell [this message]
2008-11-05 5:34 ` Mike Frysinger
2008-11-05 8:11 ` David Brownell
2008-11-05 8:32 ` Mike Frysinger
2008-11-05 8:57 ` Marc Pignat
2008-11-05 23:03 ` David Brownell
2008-11-05 8:57 ` Paulius Zaleckas
2008-11-05 9:04 ` Paulius Zaleckas
2008-11-05 15:04 ` Grant Likely
2008-11-05 22:59 ` David Brownell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200811042045.41052.david-b@pacbell.net \
--to=david-b@pacbell.net \
--cc=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
--cc=laurentp@cse-semaphore.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=linux-embedded@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paulius.zaleckas@teltonika.lt \
--cc=vapier.adi@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).