From: "Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
To: Jaya Kumar <jayakumar.lkml@gmail.com>
Cc: David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>,
Eric Miao <eric.miao@marvell.com>,
Paulius Zaleckas <paulius.zaleckas@teltonika.lt>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk,
linux-fbdev-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-embedded@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 2.6.28 1/2] gpiolib: add set/get batch v4
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 18:25:36 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090119172536.GA12407@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <45a44e480901190619i18749c75jaa2d4606da251921@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Jaya,
> >> +[OPTIONAL] Spinlock-Safe GPIO Batch access
> > Is it really spinlock safe in general? Or only if gpio_cansleep(gpio)
> > if false for each gpio to get or set?
>
> You are correct to raise this issue. It is only spinlock safe if
> chip->cansleep is false. Initially, I wasn't sure what to do. The
> original gpio set/get_value() just does;
> WARN_ON(extra_checks && chip->can_sleep);
> and it is documented as:
>
> "
> Spinlock-Safe GPIO access
> -------------------------
> <snip>
> return zero. Also, using these calls for GPIOs that can't safely be accessed
> without sleeping (see below) is an error.
> "
>
> I will change this in the batch code to return an error if can_sleep
> is detected on any involved gpio_chip.
Wait, I got it wrong. I thought gpio_set_value might sleep if
chip->cansleep is true, but there are extra API functions for
cansleep-chips. So I'd do it the same way as for the non-batch
functions and just WARN_ON(extra_checks && chip->cansleep) for each
involved chip.
Later it might make sense to add the _cansleep variants.
Best regards
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Peiner Strasse 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-01-19 17:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-01-17 9:57 [RFC 2.6.28 1/2] gpiolib: add set/get batch v4 Jaya Kumar
2009-01-17 9:57 ` [RFC 2.6.28 2/2] mach-pxa: add and use batch set/get gpio Jaya Kumar
2009-01-18 20:05 ` [RFC 2.6.28 1/2] gpiolib: add set/get batch v4 Ryan Mallon
2009-01-18 23:46 ` Jaya Kumar
2009-01-18 23:48 ` Jaya Kumar
2009-01-19 0:15 ` Ryan Mallon
2009-01-19 10:03 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2009-01-19 14:19 ` Jaya Kumar
2009-01-19 17:25 ` Uwe Kleine-König [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090119172536.GA12407@pengutronix.de \
--to=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
--cc=david-b@pacbell.net \
--cc=eric.miao@marvell.com \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=jayakumar.lkml@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=linux-embedded@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fbdev-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paulius.zaleckas@teltonika.lt \
--cc=sam@ravnborg.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).