Re: [PATCH 00/14] Pramfs: Persistent and protected ram filesystem

[Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>]

> > Why is an entire filesystem needed, instead of simply a block driver
> > if the ramdisk driver cannot be used?
> > 
> 
> >From documentation:
> 
> "A relatively straight-forward solution is to write a simple block
> driver for the non-volatile RAM, and mount over it any disk-based
> filesystem such as ext2/ext3, reiserfs, etc.
> 
> But the disk-based fs over non-volatile RAM block driver approach has
> some drawbacks:
> 
> 1. Disk-based filesystems such as ext2/ext3 were designed for optimum
>    performance on spinning disk media, so they implement features such
>    as block groups, which attempts to group inode data into a contiguous
>    set of data blocks to minimize disk seeking when accessing files. For
>    RAM there is no such concern; a file's data blocks can be scattered
>    throughout the media with no access speed penalty at all. So block
>    groups in a filesystem mounted over RAM just adds unnecessary
>    complexity. A better approach is to use a filesystem specifically
>    tailored to RAM media which does away with these disk-based features.
>    This increases the efficient use of space on the media, i.e. more
>    space is dedicated to actual file data storage and less to meta-data
>    needed to maintain that file data.

So... what is the performance difference between ext2 and your new
filesystem?

-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html