From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Morton Subject: Re: New MMC maintainer needed Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2009 15:41:37 -0700 Message-ID: <20090728154137.36d68a4e.akpm@linux-foundation.org> References: <20090714153601.6dfe70ff@mjolnir.ossman.eu> <20090722151744.fffd7bf5.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20090728222034.78966b3a@mjolnir.ossman.eu> <4A6F6A40.60203@mnementh.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <4A6F6A40.60203@mnementh.co.uk> Sender: linux-embedded-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: Ian Molton Cc: pierre@ossman.eu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-embedded@vger.kernel.org, nico@cam.org, nicolas.ferre@rfo.atmel.com, hskinnemoen@atmel.com, tony@atomide.com, david-b@pacbell.net, manuel.lauss@gmail.com, mirq-linux@rere.qmqm.pl, ppisa@pikron.com, jarkko.lavinen@nokia.com, ben@fluff.org, saschasommer@freenet.de, avorontsov@ru.mvista.com, oakad@yahoo.com, HaraldWelte@viatech.com, JosephChan@via.com.tw, adrian.hunter@nokia.com On Tue, 28 Jul 2009 22:14:40 +0100 Ian Molton wrote: > Pierre Ossman wrote: > > > MMC discussions tend to often be very system specific, which makes > > lists such as the arm kernel list more appropriate. Also, I've always > > tried to steer people to LKML as it allows others to keep a casual eye > > on things. > > I think an MMC list wouldnt be a bad idea now that we have a sort of > 'distributed maintainership' thing going on... itd help get people up to > speed... I expect that Dave Miller can set up linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org in a jiffy. A MAINTAINERS patch should be made if this is done. What I am unsure about is whether and how web-based archives of the vger lists come into being - is it automatic, or should people be asked?