From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Albin Tonnerre Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] Add support for LZO-compressed kernels for ARM Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 11:24:52 +0200 Message-ID: <20090807092423.GA4455@laptop> References: <20090731093107.GA29704@merkur.ravnborg.org> <1249311501-23102-1-git-send-email-albin.tonnerre@free-electrons.com> <1249311501-23102-2-git-send-email-albin.tonnerre@free-electrons.com> <1249311501-23102-3-git-send-email-albin.tonnerre@free-electrons.com> <1249311501-23102-4-git-send-email-albin.tonnerre@free-electrons.com> <20090806224055.GH31579@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090806224055.GH31579@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: Russell King - ARM Linux Cc: sam@ravnborg.org, hpa@zytor.com, alain@knaff.lu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-embedded@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org On Thu, Aug 06, 2009 at 11:40:55PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote : > On Mon, Aug 03, 2009 at 04:58:19PM +0200, Albin Tonnerre wrote: > > This is the second part of patch. This part includes: > > - changes to ach/arch/boot/Makefile to make it easier to add new > > compression types > > - new piggy.lzo.S necessary for lzo compression > > - changes in arch/arm/boot/compressed/misc.c to allow the use of lzo or > > gzip, depending on the config > > - Kconfig support > FYI, with these patches applied and selecting GZIP method, I get > linker errors. I've been unable to track down what's going on, but > it appears to be a libgcc issue. > In spite of the decompressor being built as an EABI object, gcc seems > to be issuing calls to __umodsi3, which isn't in the EABI libgcc > (they're called something different - don't ask.) I also happen to have issues related to the linker not finding __aeabi_uidivmod, but only when compiling with CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE. Is it similar for you, or does it also fail when compiling with -O2 ? > So I think these patches need further testing and evaluation on ARM > before they can be merged. Moreover, I'd like to see some comparisons > between the _current_ gzip method, the new gzip method and the lzo > method on ARM. I don't have my ARM platforms at hand, but I'll so these comparisons in a couple days when I access to them again. Regards, -- Albin Tonnerre, Free Electrons Kernel, drivers and embedded Linux development, consulting, training and support. http://free-electrons.com