From: Robert Schwebel <r.schwebel@pengutronix.de>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.ml.walleij@gmail.com>
Cc: Robert Schwebel <r.schwebel@pengutronix.de>,
Zan Lynx <zlynx@acm.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-embedded@vger.kernel.org,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>,
Tim Bird <tim.bird@am.sony.com>,
kernel@pengutronix.de
Subject: Re: New fast(?)-boot results on ARM
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 23:15:00 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090814211500.GC31727@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <63386a3d0908141401t6050f39ey8d85213aeccf748a@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 11:01:58PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> >> > That's factor 70 away from the 110 ms boot time Tim has talked about
> >> > some days ago (and he measured on an ARM cpu which had almost half
> >> > the speed of this one), and I'm wondering what we can do to improve
> >> > the boot time.
> >>
> >> 2.4s in uncompression? That seems like an obvious target for
> >> improvement.
> >
> > Indeed, we'll check that.
>
> We got rid of uncompression on a flash-based system vastly improving
> boot time. The reason is that compressed kernels are faster only when
> the throughput to the persistent storage is lower than the decompression
> throughput, and on typical embedded systems with DMA the throughput to
> memory outperforms the CPU-based decompression.
>
> Of course it depends on a lot of stuff like performance of flash controller,
> kernel storage filesystem performance, DMA controller performance,
> cache architecture etc so it's individual per-system.
We have also done that on NOR based systems, but I'm not sure if it will
work out for NAND as well.
Thanks,
rsc
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-08-14 21:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-08-14 17:02 New fast(?)-boot results on ARM Robert Schwebel
2009-08-14 18:19 ` Zan Lynx
2009-08-14 18:46 ` Jamie Lokier
2009-08-14 18:58 ` Robert Schwebel
2009-08-14 18:57 ` Robert Schwebel
2009-08-14 21:01 ` Linus Walleij
2009-08-14 21:15 ` Robert Schwebel [this message]
2009-08-14 21:35 ` Zan Lynx
2009-08-15 6:21 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2009-08-14 20:04 ` Denys Vlasenko
2009-08-14 20:43 ` Robert Schwebel
2009-08-15 5:59 ` Dirk Behme
2009-08-15 10:35 ` Johannes Stezenbach
2009-08-18 10:06 ` Marco Stornelli
2009-08-18 10:21 ` Robert Schwebel
2009-08-18 10:34 ` Alex Riesen
2009-08-18 10:44 ` Robert Schwebel
2009-08-18 10:48 ` Alex Riesen
2009-08-18 10:53 ` Robert Schwebel
2009-09-04 16:16 ` Wolfram Sang
2009-09-09 14:33 ` Johannes Stezenbach
2009-09-10 0:03 ` Denys Vlasenko
2009-08-17 19:15 ` Tim Bird
2009-08-17 22:35 ` new ipdelay= option for faster netboot (was Re: New fast(?)-boot results on ARM) Tim Bird
2009-08-18 1:03 ` new ipdelay= option for faster netboot David Miller
2009-08-18 1:24 ` Tim Bird
2009-08-18 1:27 ` David Miller
2009-08-18 1:40 ` Tim Bird
2009-08-18 1:56 ` David Miller
2009-08-19 11:57 ` Jamie Lokier
2009-08-18 4:56 ` Denys Vlasenko
2009-08-18 5:00 ` David Miller
2009-08-18 1:31 ` Rick Jones
2009-08-18 2:45 ` david
2009-08-18 4:56 ` Willy Tarreau
2009-08-15 6:14 ` New fast(?)-boot results on ARM Artem Bityutskiy
2009-08-18 14:06 ` Sascha Hauer
2009-08-18 15:31 ` Dirk Behme
2009-08-18 16:34 ` Marco Stornelli
2009-08-18 18:23 ` Tim Bird
2009-08-19 7:21 ` Sascha Hauer
2009-08-19 16:20 ` Dirk Behme
2009-08-20 8:57 ` Sascha Hauer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090814211500.GC31727@pengutronix.de \
--to=r.schwebel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=arjan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=linus.ml.walleij@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-embedded@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tim.bird@am.sony.com \
--cc=zlynx@acm.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).