linux-embedded.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
To: Dirk Behme <dirk.behme@googlemail.com>
Cc: Robert Schwebel <r.schwebel@pengutronix.de>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-embedded@vger.kernel.org,
	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>,
	Tim Bird <tim.bird@am.sony.com>,
	kernel@pengutronix.de
Subject: Re: New fast(?)-boot results on ARM
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 10:57:24 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090820085724.GG23444@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4A8C263D.9000009@googlemail.com>

On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 06:20:13PM +0200, Dirk Behme wrote:
>>
>> Yes, correct. The copying itself is between 'copy' and 'done' so it
>> takes about 0.4s.
>>
>>> What's the size of the uncompressed kernel copied here?
>>
>> The image is about 2.8MB, but I copied the whole partition of 3MB
>> because with raw images you can't detect the image size.
>
> With 3MB copied in ~0.4s you get ~8MB/s. This really depends on your HW, 
> but I would think with standard NOR flashes you should be able to do at 
> least two (three?) times better. Have you already checked the memory (NOR 
> flash) timings configured in your SoC?

It's NAND flash, so there's not much timing to optimize. What's
interesting about this is that the kernel NAND driver is much slower
than the one in U-Boot. Looking at it it turned out that the kernel
driver uses interrupts to wait for the controller to get ready.
Switching this to polling nearly doubles the NAND performance. UBI
mounts much faster now and this cuts off another few seconds from the
boot process :)

Sascha


-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           |                             |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0    |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686           | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |

      reply	other threads:[~2009-08-20  8:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-08-14 17:02 New fast(?)-boot results on ARM Robert Schwebel
2009-08-14 18:19 ` Zan Lynx
2009-08-14 18:46   ` Jamie Lokier
2009-08-14 18:58     ` Robert Schwebel
2009-08-14 18:57   ` Robert Schwebel
2009-08-14 21:01     ` Linus Walleij
2009-08-14 21:15       ` Robert Schwebel
2009-08-14 21:35       ` Zan Lynx
2009-08-15  6:21         ` Artem Bityutskiy
2009-08-14 20:04 ` Denys Vlasenko
2009-08-14 20:43   ` Robert Schwebel
2009-08-15  5:59     ` Dirk Behme
2009-08-15 10:35     ` Johannes Stezenbach
2009-08-18 10:06       ` Marco Stornelli
2009-08-18 10:21         ` Robert Schwebel
2009-08-18 10:34           ` Alex Riesen
2009-08-18 10:44             ` Robert Schwebel
2009-08-18 10:48               ` Alex Riesen
2009-08-18 10:53                 ` Robert Schwebel
2009-09-04 16:16       ` Wolfram Sang
2009-09-09 14:33         ` Johannes Stezenbach
2009-09-10  0:03           ` Denys Vlasenko
2009-08-17 19:15     ` Tim Bird
2009-08-17 22:35       ` new ipdelay= option for faster netboot (was Re: New fast(?)-boot results on ARM) Tim Bird
2009-08-18  1:03         ` new ipdelay= option for faster netboot David Miller
2009-08-18  1:24           ` Tim Bird
2009-08-18  1:27             ` David Miller
2009-08-18  1:40               ` Tim Bird
2009-08-18  1:56                 ` David Miller
2009-08-19 11:57                 ` Jamie Lokier
2009-08-18  4:56               ` Denys Vlasenko
2009-08-18  5:00                 ` David Miller
2009-08-18  1:31           ` Rick Jones
2009-08-18  2:45             ` david
2009-08-18  4:56               ` Willy Tarreau
2009-08-15  6:14   ` New fast(?)-boot results on ARM Artem Bityutskiy
2009-08-18 14:06 ` Sascha Hauer
2009-08-18 15:31   ` Dirk Behme
2009-08-18 16:34     ` Marco Stornelli
2009-08-18 18:23     ` Tim Bird
2009-08-19  7:21     ` Sascha Hauer
2009-08-19 16:20       ` Dirk Behme
2009-08-20  8:57         ` Sascha Hauer [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090820085724.GG23444@pengutronix.de \
    --to=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=arjan@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=dirk.behme@googlemail.com \
    --cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=linux-embedded@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=r.schwebel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=tim.bird@am.sony.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).