linux-embedded.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
To: Ming Lei <tom.leiming@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-embedded@vger.kernel.org, a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH] ARM: fix 'unannotated irqs-on' lockdep warning
Date: Mon, 24 May 2010 08:19:21 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100524071921.GA17528@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100524112355.18424622@tom-lei>

On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 11:23:55AM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> On Sun, 23 May 2010 20:47:46 +0100
> Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> wrote:
> > Moreover, I put to you that it's utterly pointless - and a waste of
> > CPU time - telling lockdep about the IRQ masking when an exception
> 
> Yes, the patch still tries to remove the pointless trace of IRQ masking,
> such as: replace disable_irq with disable_irq_notrace.
> 
> > occurs, and it's also pointless telling lockdep about the IRQ
> > unmasking when we resume userspace.
> 
> Even it is pointless, but if lockdep doesn't see the IRQ unmasking, the 
> warning "unannotated irqs-on" will be triggered and lockdep doe not work
> any longer, so we have to remove the warning to make lockdep workable on
> ARM, could you agree on it?  It is the main purpose of the patch.

I'm sorry, I think we have a communication issue; you're not understanding
the points that I'm making.  I feel I'm wasting my time trying to explain
it.

I'm not merging your patch as-is because I believe it to be wrong.

  reply	other threads:[~2010-05-24  7:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-05-23 11:48 [RESEND PATCH] ARM: fix 'unannotated irqs-on' lockdep warning tom.leiming
2010-05-23 12:38 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-05-23 13:44   ` Ming Lei
2010-05-23 14:13     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-05-23 15:07       ` Ming Lei
2010-05-23 19:47         ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-05-24  3:23           ` Ming Lei
2010-05-24  7:19             ` Russell King - ARM Linux [this message]
2010-05-24 10:14               ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-05-24 14:20                 ` Ming Lei
2010-05-24 14:45                   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-05-24 15:19                     ` Ming Lei

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100524071921.GA17528@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk \
    --to=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-embedded@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tom.leiming@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).