From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
To: Ming Lei <tom.leiming@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-embedded@vger.kernel.org, a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH] ARM: fix 'unannotated irqs-on' lockdep warning
Date: Mon, 24 May 2010 08:19:21 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100524071921.GA17528@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100524112355.18424622@tom-lei>
On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 11:23:55AM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> On Sun, 23 May 2010 20:47:46 +0100
> Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> wrote:
> > Moreover, I put to you that it's utterly pointless - and a waste of
> > CPU time - telling lockdep about the IRQ masking when an exception
>
> Yes, the patch still tries to remove the pointless trace of IRQ masking,
> such as: replace disable_irq with disable_irq_notrace.
>
> > occurs, and it's also pointless telling lockdep about the IRQ
> > unmasking when we resume userspace.
>
> Even it is pointless, but if lockdep doesn't see the IRQ unmasking, the
> warning "unannotated irqs-on" will be triggered and lockdep doe not work
> any longer, so we have to remove the warning to make lockdep workable on
> ARM, could you agree on it? It is the main purpose of the patch.
I'm sorry, I think we have a communication issue; you're not understanding
the points that I'm making. I feel I'm wasting my time trying to explain
it.
I'm not merging your patch as-is because I believe it to be wrong.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-05-24 7:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-05-23 11:48 [RESEND PATCH] ARM: fix 'unannotated irqs-on' lockdep warning tom.leiming
2010-05-23 12:38 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-05-23 13:44 ` Ming Lei
2010-05-23 14:13 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-05-23 15:07 ` Ming Lei
2010-05-23 19:47 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-05-24 3:23 ` Ming Lei
2010-05-24 7:19 ` Russell King - ARM Linux [this message]
2010-05-24 10:14 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-05-24 14:20 ` Ming Lei
2010-05-24 14:45 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-05-24 15:19 ` Ming Lei
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100524071921.GA17528@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk \
--to=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-embedded@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tom.leiming@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).