From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH] ARM: fix 'unannotated irqs-on' lockdep warning
Date: Mon, 24 May 2010 08:19:21 +0100
Message-ID: <20100524071921.GA17528@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
References: <1274615328-27953-1-git-send-email-tom.leiming@gmail.com> <20100523123801.GC950@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <AANLkTikRp0EHxshKYq39p18ymoRNAtyHrNm3yq6A49-r@mail.gmail.com> <20100523141300.GD950@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <AANLkTinV9Na9zxYMIfTr893Ynnc0YOk2B6uPKEa9s4R1@mail.gmail.com> <20100523194746.GE950@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20100524112355.18424622@tom-lei>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Return-path: <linux-embedded-owner@vger.kernel.org>
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=arm.linux.org.uk; s=caramon; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:
	Message-ID:References:MIME-Version:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:
	Sender; bh=ax3nHc/WSW7iC+MWkzYEf58Hr/euCOdJh76B5dRjdsw=; b=PG9fj
	dDNpfuoW8PePQiAN0ULhoKrlO0RjK8eo5gvX5manyxqGCR+B/WZZe67HAJU4Erg5
	8ngZsTuwNFmXk/KRbi9Pgak5nCEuB5bQKiyx6O/IN6JgtKUVZdRD1lgUmqfLG9Ci
	iDq3s61tmVsTon4/esU/mwPcT60uZvJEDee5MA=
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20100524112355.18424622@tom-lei>
Sender: linux-embedded-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-embedded.vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: Ming Lei <tom.leiming@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-embedded@vger.kernel.org, a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 11:23:55AM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> On Sun, 23 May 2010 20:47:46 +0100
> Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> wrote:
> > Moreover, I put to you that it's utterly pointless - and a waste of
> > CPU time - telling lockdep about the IRQ masking when an exception
> 
> Yes, the patch still tries to remove the pointless trace of IRQ masking,
> such as: replace disable_irq with disable_irq_notrace.
> 
> > occurs, and it's also pointless telling lockdep about the IRQ
> > unmasking when we resume userspace.
> 
> Even it is pointless, but if lockdep doesn't see the IRQ unmasking, the 
> warning "unannotated irqs-on" will be triggered and lockdep doe not work
> any longer, so we have to remove the warning to make lockdep workable on
> ARM, could you agree on it?  It is the main purpose of the patch.

I'm sorry, I think we have a communication issue; you're not understanding
the points that I'm making.  I feel I'm wasting my time trying to explain
it.

I'm not merging your patch as-is because I believe it to be wrong.