From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: James Hogan Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/16 v2] pramfs: super block operations Date: Sat, 6 Nov 2010 13:12:58 +0000 Message-ID: <20101106131257.GB13522@gandalf.local> References: <4CD51847.20306@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4CD51847.20306@gmail.com> Sender: linux-embedded-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" To: Marco Stornelli Cc: Linux Kernel , Linux Embedded , Linux FS Devel , Tim Bird , Andrew Morton Hi, On Sat, Nov 06, 2010 at 09:56:39AM +0100, Marco Stornelli wrote: > From: Marco Stornelli >=20 > Super block operations. >=20 > Signed-off-by: Marco Stornelli > --- > diff -Nurp linux-2.6.36-orig/fs/pramfs/super.c linux-2.6.36/fs/pramfs= /super.c > --- linux-2.6.36-orig/fs/pramfs/super.c 1970-01-01 01:00:00.000000000= +0100 > +++ linux-2.6.36/fs/pramfs/super.c 2010-09-25 14:09:47.000000000 +020= 0 > + pram_dbg("max name length %d\n", PRAM_NAME_LEN); I get a warning on this line that could be avoided: fs/pramfs/super.c: In function =E2=80=98pram_init=E2=80=99: fs/pramfs/super.c:308: warning: format =E2=80=98%d=E2=80=99 expects typ= e =E2=80=98int=E2=80=99, but argument 2 has type =E2=80=98long unsigned int=E2=80=99 Cheers James