From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Brown Subject: Re: [PATCH] PM: Hide CONFIG_PM from users Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2011 14:18:29 +0000 Message-ID: <20110207141829.GK10564@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> References: <1297081335-13631-1-git-send-email-broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <20110208011324.d5371c4c.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110208011324.d5371c4c.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Len Brown , Alan Stern , linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton , Dmitry Torokhov , linux-embedded@vger.kernel.org, ppc-dev On Tue, Feb 08, 2011 at 01:13:24AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > On Mon, 7 Feb 2011 12:22:15 +0000 Mark Brown wrote: > > + bool > > + default y if !IA64_HP_SIM > Several powerpc configs have CONFIG_PM (implicitly) disabled (e.g. the > server configs), so this will unexpectedly turn it on for them. Do you mean that these systems require CONFIG_PM be turned off, or just that people tend not to turn it on? If the latter would you expect any ill effects from doing so?