From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicholas Mc Guire Subject: Re: About the "Tiny Linux Kernel" project Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2011 07:06:23 +0200 Message-ID: <20110611050622.GA25692@opentech.at> References: <4DF2B3EC.6020700@am.sony.com> <4DF2B952.30309@am.sony.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: celinux-dev-bounces-6s6PN4bAfpxAfugRpC6u6w@public.gmane.org Errors-To: celinux-dev-bounces-6s6PN4bAfpxAfugRpC6u6w@public.gmane.org To: wu zhangjin Cc: Dongdong Deng , Zhan Rongkai , "linux-embedded-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , "celinux-dev-VxL1A5FK7jA05z2xGA6PZHhyD016LWXt@public.gmane.org" On Sat, 11 Jun 2011, wu zhangjin wrote: > On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 8:39 AM, Tim Bird wrote: > > On 06/10/2011 05:16 PM, Tim Bird wrote: > >> The system has a full network and bluetooth stack, sensor > >> monitoring software, and a web browser. > > Oops. Should be "web server". ?I don't know of a modern > > browser that fits in less than 3 meg. > > For web browser, what bout lynx, links2 and w3m? ;-) > and if limited functionality is needed a custom browser can be built easily (even netcat + shell could do) - for web servers there are plenty of very small servers for serving static pages combined with a process to updated the pages (i.e. cron/shell loop) this is fine for monitoring a system (thttp or the like - 20k) the static page limit is actually advisable due to security issues or it starts getting really complicated. hofrat