From: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>,
Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@ardb.de>, Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>,
Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>,
Igor Grinberg <grinberg@compulab.co.il>,
linux-embedded@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Handling of modular boards
Date: Wed, 9 May 2012 18:12:33 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120509171233.GL3955@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACRpkdb4LGXfJ72uODr841O7M4FGTYKa1X7y6ekeLUw9vaL=mw@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 767 bytes --]
On Tue, May 08, 2012 at 02:26:54PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 9:34 PM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote:
> > Thanks for getting the discussion started. I've seen the same issue come
> > up for arch/arm/mach-ux500/board-mop500*uib.c and for the beaglebone.
> > I'm sure there are many more, but we should make sure that everyone
> > of these can live with whatever we come up with.
> The same issue sort of comes up with any system that uses the idiom
> to have a few GPIO lines indicate in a binary code what version of the
> board we're dealing with and what devices are thus on it, right?
> We have this issue for the U9540 reference design and potentially
> on the Snowball as well.
Yes, I think that's basically the same problem.
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-05-09 17:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-05-04 18:58 Handling of modular boards Mark Brown
2012-05-04 19:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-05-04 20:07 ` Mark Brown
2012-05-04 20:33 ` Wolfgang Denk
2012-05-04 20:39 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-05-04 20:54 ` Wolfgang Denk
2012-05-04 21:03 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-05-04 21:09 ` Stephen Warren
2012-05-04 21:52 ` Mark Brown
2012-05-04 22:09 ` Mark Brown
2012-05-10 10:41 ` Ben Dooks
2012-05-10 12:40 ` Igor Grinberg
2012-05-10 16:15 ` Stephen Warren
2012-05-11 6:15 ` Igor Grinberg
2012-05-08 12:26 ` Linus Walleij
2012-05-09 17:12 ` Mark Brown [this message]
2012-05-04 19:50 ` Stephen Warren
2012-05-04 20:38 ` Wolfgang Denk
2012-05-04 20:59 ` Stephen Warren
2012-05-04 20:44 ` Mark Brown
2012-05-08 12:33 ` Linus Walleij
2012-05-09 8:41 ` Alessandro Rubini
2012-05-10 10:43 ` Ben Dooks
2012-05-10 16:11 ` Stephen Warren
2012-05-04 22:55 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-05-04 23:40 ` Mark Brown
2012-05-04 23:52 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-05-05 0:03 ` Mark Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120509171233.GL3955@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
--to=broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
--cc=arnd@ardb.de \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=grinberg@compulab.co.il \
--cc=lee.jones@linaro.org \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-embedded@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=olof@lixom.net \
--cc=sameo@linux.intel.com \
--cc=swarren@wwwdotorg.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).