From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Fundu Subject: Flatten device tree & PPC linux Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 22:44:25 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <260388.87819.qm@web63408.mail.re1.yahoo.com> References: <1218656903.10489.50.camel@localhost.localdomain> Reply-To: fundu_1999@yahoo.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1218656903.10489.50.camel@localhost.localdomain> Sender: linux-embedded-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: linux-embedded@vger.kernel.org i was reading this ... http://free-electrons.com/kerneldoc/latest/powerpc/booting-without-of.txt and was wondering if the kernel 2.4(yes 2.4) expects a flatten device tree ? Anybody any ideas ? TIA ! --- On Wed, 8/13/08, Josh Boyer wrote: > From: Josh Boyer > Subject: kernel dump solutions > To: linux-embedded@vger.kernel.org > Date: Wednesday, August 13, 2008, 12:48 PM > Hi All, > > I'm curious what people are using for a kernel dump > solution on embedded > platforms. It seems that kexec/kdump is the default > solution for > desktop and server machines, but this seems to be a bit > heavy for > embedded platforms. Requiring a second kernel to do the > dump seems like > a cost that most platform designers wouldn't be willing > to incur. > > The only other alternative that I'm aware of is LKCD. > It doesn't seem > particularly active at all these days. Mcore has been > sufficiently dead > for years. So what's left? What else are people > using? > > josh > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line > "unsubscribe linux-embedded" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at > http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html