From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arjan van de Ven Subject: Re: [Bug #11342] Linux 2.6.27-rc3: kernel BUG at mm/vmalloc.c - bisected Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 03:58:58 -0700 Message-ID: <48B53372.5060308@linux.intel.com> References: <200808261111.19205.rusty@rustcorp.com.au> <20080826183051.GB10925@cs181140183.pp.htv.fi> <20080826205916.GB11734@cs181140183.pp.htv.fi> <18612.60878.887716.452936@drongo.ozlabs.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <18612.60878.887716.452936-nUko2b1QN/1kfgV4h6NXRTJtLkR7yuzc@public.gmane.org> Sender: kernel-testers-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" To: Paul Mackerras Cc: Linus Torvalds , Parag Warudkar , Adrian Bunk , Rusty Russell , "Alan D. Brunelle" , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Kernel Testers List , Andrew Morton , Ingo Molnar , linux-embedded-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org Paul Mackerras wrote: > Linus Torvalds writes: > >> 4kB used to be the _only_ choice. And no, there weren't even irq stacks. >> So that 4kB was not just the whole kernel call-chain, it was also all the >> irq nesting above it. > > I think your memory is failing you. In 2.4 and earlier, the kernel > stack was 8kB minus the size of the task_struct, which sat at the > start of the 8kB. For instance, from include/asm-i386/processor.h for > 2.4.29: but was shared with interrupts; so out of the 6Kb left, you had still really only 4Kb for user context stack