From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Phillip Lougher <phillip@lougher.demon.co.uk>
Subject: Re: Subject: [PATCH 01/16] Squashfs: inode operations
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 01:32:43 +0100
Message-ID: <48FD232B.10508@lougher.demon.co.uk>
References: <E1KqrTW-0001xC-9M@dylan> <20081017165300.GA8076@logfs.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE
Return-path: <linux-embedded-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <20081017165300.GA8076@logfs.org>
Sender: linux-embedded-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-embedded.vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; format="flowed"
To: =?UTF-8?B?SsO2cm4gRW5nZWw=?= <joern@logfs.org>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-embedded@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tim.bird@am.sony.com

J=C3=B6rn Engel wrote:
> None of the comments below are a reason against mainline inclusion, i=
mo.
> They should get handled, but whether that happens before or after a
> merge doesn't really matter.

Yeah you're right regarding your comments.  That's where code-review=20
comes in handy, to spot things you don't see because you're too used to=
=20
the code.

I'm working on a re-spin incorporating your comments, and it should be=20
ready tomorrow.

Thanks for the code-review.

Phillip