From: Bill Gatliff <bgat@billgatliff.com>
To: linux-embedded@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] [PWM] Generic PWM API implementation
Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2008 14:16:08 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4910AD88.2000200@billgatliff.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8bd0f97a0810170859k72dc1bc5o34ed2388f95c3bc8@mail.gmail.com>
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 14:14, Bill Gatliff wrote:
>> +int pwm_register(struct pwm_device *pwm)
>> +{
>> + struct pwm_channel *p;
>> + int wchan;
>> + int ret = 0;
>
> the initialization to 0 here isnt needed
This is literally the only feedback I have received. I take that to mean that
the code basically works as advertised, and nobody else has any problems with it
(it continues to work fine for me here).
So, what's the next step? How do I advocate for getting this API into mainline?
b.g.
--
Bill Gatliff
bgat@billgatliff.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-11-04 20:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-10-15 18:14 [PATCH 0/6] Generic PWM API implementation Bill Gatliff
2008-10-15 18:14 ` [PATCH 1/6] [PWM] " Bill Gatliff
2008-10-17 15:59 ` Mike Frysinger
2008-11-04 20:16 ` Bill Gatliff [this message]
2008-11-04 20:51 ` Mike Frysinger
2008-11-04 23:55 ` David Brownell
2008-11-05 0:17 ` Mike Frysinger
2008-11-05 2:59 ` Bill Gatliff
2008-11-05 5:08 ` David Brownell
2008-11-05 2:56 ` Bill Gatliff
2008-10-15 18:14 ` [PATCH 2/6] [PWM] Changes to existing include/linux/pwm.h to adapt to generic PWM API Bill Gatliff
2008-10-15 18:14 ` [PATCH 3/6] [PWM] Documentation Bill Gatliff
2008-10-15 18:14 ` [PATCH 4/6] [PWM] Driver for Atmel PWMC peripheral Bill Gatliff
2008-10-15 18:14 ` [PATCH 5/6] [PWM] Install new Atmel PWMC driver in Kconfig, expunge old one Bill Gatliff
2008-10-15 18:14 ` [PATCH 6/6] [PWM] New LED driver and trigger that use PWM API Bill Gatliff
2009-11-13 19:08 ` [PATCH 0/6] Generic PWM API implementation Grant Likely
2009-11-14 4:22 ` Mike Frysinger
2009-11-14 7:55 ` Grant Likely
2009-11-17 7:47 ` David Brownell
2009-11-17 15:48 ` Bill Gatliff
2009-11-17 16:53 ` David Brownell
2009-11-20 22:51 ` Grant Likely
2009-11-20 22:14 ` Grant Likely
2009-11-23 14:12 ` Bill Gatliff
2009-11-23 17:39 ` Grant Likely
2009-11-23 20:51 ` Albrecht Dreß
2009-11-28 21:38 ` David Brownell
2009-11-28 21:59 ` David Brownell
2009-11-17 15:45 ` Bill Gatliff
2009-11-17 8:27 ` David Brownell
2009-11-17 15:54 ` Bill Gatliff
2009-11-20 22:21 ` Grant Likely
2009-11-23 14:13 ` Bill Gatliff
2009-11-23 17:40 ` Grant Likely
2009-11-23 15:29 ` Mark Brown
2009-11-23 17:44 ` Grant Likely
2009-11-23 18:09 ` Mark Brown
2009-11-28 21:54 ` David Brownell
2009-11-17 15:39 ` Bill Gatliff
2009-11-20 22:49 ` Grant Likely
2009-11-28 21:28 ` David Brownell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4910AD88.2000200@billgatliff.com \
--to=bgat@billgatliff.com \
--cc=linux-embedded@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).